Since Beech is a common wood for today’s entry level muzzleloader stocks, does anyone know if it was also used by early gun builders instead of Maple, Walnut & Cherrry?
Rarely in colonial and Federal periods here. Because it’s plain, at best.Since Beech is a common wood for today’s entry level muzzleloader stocks, does anyone know if it was also used by early gun builders instead of Maple, Walnut & Cherrry?
Wow…what was the reasoning behind such disdain for beechwood?I take it from period accounts that British Ordnance intensely disliked having to resort to accepting "Dutch" Muskets with Beech stocks and they only did it when the need was so urgent at the beginning of wars. From what I've learned from Bailey, the first major number of such beech stocked muskets accepted was during the Napoleonic Wars. Once the wars were over, they got rid (surplus sold) of the Beech stocked muskets right away, even if in fairly new condition. Then the rest of the "Dutch" or foreign made muskets as soon as possible after that, though they sometimes cut down the barrels for sea service muskets.
Gus
It's a comparably soft wood.
I've worked some of it on other projects, and what I had was pretty soft. Then again, I have had both walnut and maple that were very soft, or harder than woodpecker lips. I guess it depends on the individual tree.Oh, no it ain't. It's harder than American walnut. Considerably harder than cherry. Definitely harder than birch. It can be every bit as hard as the best sugar maple.
It is, however, rather splintery and unpleasant to work with.
Beech has very prominent rays, and can be rather gaudy in appearance.
Enter your email address to join: