Contacted Kibler about Hawkins rifle.

sportster73hp · Sep 16, 2024

springfield art said:
He uses locks from the high quality makers, I don't believe he makes his own locks; he supplies the best locks along with his kits. I'm sure he can source a percussion lock from the same quality makers. The 'traffic' I see lately here about a Kibler Hawken convinces me he's going to be successful if he offers one.

You sir have not followed Mr. Kibler’s work. He has been producing his own locks since at least 2021. Supplying for both his own kit and to other people for their own creations.
He does have a web site and YouTube channel which keeps current customers and those interested in what is happening at his shop. I believe you can also sign up for email updates which will give you offered quick ship guns and links to new videos.

Mike in FL · Sep 16, 2024

BS2366 said:
You're crazy to think I wouldn't drag that 10-15 pound rifle to the woods with me after paying that much $ and putting the time into finishing and assembling the thing!

Oh my, I didn't mean to rile anyone up. I suppose I forgot we are all different.

BS2366 · Sep 16, 2024

Mike in FL said:
Oh my, I didn't mean to rile anyone up. I suppose I forgot we are all different.

Oh no! Not riled up. All in good fun!

Eric Krewson · Sep 17, 2024

My heaviest rifle has a 15/16 straight .44 barrel that is 42" long, the rifle weighs 10# 3 oz. After toting TCs through the woods for 40 years, my gifted rifle felt like a boat anchor. I treasured this gift so I sold my TCs and hunted with it exclusively, in a very short period time I got used to the extra weight and didn't ever think about it. I hunted with this rifle for several years until I built a Lancaster style rifle and later a much lighter Haines with a 38" swamped C weight .54 barrel. Out of all the rifles I own, the Haines checks all of the boxes for being user friendly as well as balanced and comfortable to carry.

I put a deer or two in my freezer every year with my heavy rifle, I hunted with it exclusively for 5 or 6 years.

After I made an attempt to build a rifle, I swapped over to using my new build, it was downright first gun ugly but has a fast lock and was very accurate.

sturmkatze · Sep 17, 2024

brazosland said:
Yall complaining about an extra two pounds making the rifle unusable are embarrassing to me as a shooter and a proponent of the hobby/sport.

And the Men that used and carried these guns across thousands of miles of wilderness averaged 5’10 and 170 pounds…at best. The Nancy’s complaining about the weight of an actual reproduction should maybe find another dress-up hobby like Cowboy Action Shooting.

Why buy the gun if it’s just another watered down, sort of looks like a historical gun? Just enjoy your TC “Hawkins” and call it a day.

First, the vast majority of guys here are older and don’t carry it every day. Why would you be so insulting? I guess you need to feel superior.

sturmkatze · Sep 17, 2024

yellowhammer said:
View attachment 349025

I guess

Wncman · Sep 17, 2024

springfield art said:
He uses locks from the high quality makers, I don't believe he makes his own locks; he supplies the best locks along with his kits. I'm sure he can source a percussion lock from the same quality makers. The 'traffic' I see lately here about a Kibler Hawken convinces me he's going to be successful if he offers one.

He makes the round faced English lock.
Not sure about the other one he calls the import lock. I think it’s in reference to the style though

longcruise · Sep 17, 2024

Wncman said:
He makes the round faced English lock.
Not sure about the other one he calls the import lock. I think it’s in reference to the style though

I think he initially used the Chambers Late Ketland in the SMR. It seems probable that when he started making his own locks that he would duplicate the Late Ketland in at least the major measurements. That would eliminate the need to re write the cnc code for the stock.

But that's just me swagging it. I don't know CNC from PVC.

mikesto44 · Sep 17, 2024

Whatever Jim does...just don't make a comment about how he does or this might help suggestion.

Boomerang · Sep 17, 2024

Heavy is a relative term. Most of my relatives are heavy!

springfield art · Sep 17, 2024

I bet ol' Jim has an automated counter on his computer to keep track of all the "Hawken" traffic that's brewing lately!

MosesWhite · Sep 17, 2024

longcruise said:
Well then you are wrong on both counts by attaching the "s" to both. Just warming you up to the heat that will surround the Kibler Hawken regardless of the choices Jim makes!

I'd like to see a plains rifle somewhat like the GPR but with earlier features. But I think he'll do better with a Hawken no matter how he designs it.

Actually there was a stamp used in the early 30's that was ; J. & S. HAWKENS .

7

longcruise · Sep 17, 2024

MosesWhite said:
Actually there was a stamp used in the early 30's that was ; J. & S. HAWKENS .

7

Sooo, their actual name was Hawkens? And all this time TC has been bashed for appropriating their name when they didn't.

Dude · Sep 18, 2024

I'm guessing the Hawken rifles had heavy barrels because they didn't have high grade steel like today. And I often wondered why octagonal barrels were so much the fashion when they involved a lot more labor. Then I realized an octagonal barrel is stronger than a round one.

Considering all that, I'd bet a 15/16ths barrel is probably stronger than the largest chunk guns from back then.

I'm on the other side of the fence from the guys who want an exact duplicate of an original Hawken - keep it functional and not over-engineered. Barrels had to be heavy back then, but not necessary now. Why make it 14lbs when 10 or 11 is more than sufficient? Just keep things in proportion and do what's necessary to pull that off.

sportster73hp · Sep 18, 2024

This is off the subject a bit but Jim sent out an email to get/buy special order curly ash kits yesterday. Beautiful wood !

reddogge · Sep 18, 2024

I don't have a photo of the J&S Hawken(s) stamp but their name was Hawken.

longcruise · Sep 18, 2024

Maybe the J & S Hawkens was their idea of plural? I don't recall how their predecessors spelled it.

Maybe they ordered a stamp and the maker made a mistake. "Eh, let's just go with it"

reddogge · Sep 18, 2024

In John Baird's book "Hawken Rifles" on page 21 there is a photo of a well worn J&S Hawken stamp on a rifle. No "S". On page 25 there is a photo of a lock plate with J&S Hawken on it. This leads me to believe they never put an S on the end of their name.

yellowhammer · Sep 18, 2024

sportster73hp said:
This is off the subject a bit but Jim sent out an email to get/buy special order curly ash kits yesterday. Beautiful wood !

@Cooleys is one of the prettiest ash-stocked longrifles I have ever seen: THREAD

I wonder if any of the original Hawkens were ash stocked

.

sportster73hp · Sep 19, 2024

Jim had some ash stocks back in june 2022 on display at their open house. They normally don’t do ash but Katherine told him to use it because they had some.

Contacted Kibler about Hawkins rifle.

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

50 Cal.

50 Cal.

45 Cal.

54 Cal.

.177 Cal.

.177 Cal.

45 Cal.

70 Cal.

50 Cal.

.54 Cal.

Cannon

32 Cal

70 Cal.

45 Cal.

50 Cal.

45 Cal.

70 Cal.

45 Cal.

45 Cal.

50 Cal.

Similar threads

Join the conversation!

Join today and get all the highlights of this community direct to your inbox. It's FREE!