Uberti Paterson

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
None of the above. I haven’t even fully disassembled it. I may shoot it again a couple of times before I retire it. Mostly it’s just for lookin at.
 
I just finished working on a Pietta Paterson. Corrected the short arbor, made a music wire spring for that goofy folding trigger, tuned the hammer spring. It took two men and a boy plus a hydraulic jack to cock the hammer. Also thinned the left bolt leg as it was thick and clunky. There is not much that can be done to the Paterson as far as tuning is concerned. I did find an interesting problem. This pistol would get very hard to cycle eventually locking itself up. The design is 4 pivot screws, hammer, trigger, bolt and a sear link. The sear link and bolt pivots have no heads on the screws. The bolt screw is just long enough to support the bolt with no support on the inner end. If it's turned in until it stops the pistol is locked up. The bolt pivot screw will hit the trigger/sear link and bind it solid. This particular pistol had a habit of turning this screw in each time it was cocked and eventually locking up. Once that problem was solved it became a lot more reliable. I wouldn't consider a Paterson a daily driver due to design limits and being somewhat fragile. As an occasional shooter it should be fine. There's a reason the design didn't stay around long.
 
... I wouldn't consider a Paterson a daily driver due to design limits and being somewhat fragile. As an occasional shooter it should be fine. There's a reason the design didn't stay around long.

No one in their right mind would consider any muzzle loading firearm to be a "daily driver", any more a Model T or a Wright flyer would be. They are interesting and fascinating relics and reproductions of another era. Nothing more than that.
 
I have not heard of a Comanche raid in quite some time. Not that I would blame them if they did but I think a high capacity 9mm would be dramatically better.

The Paterson is over my comfort edge. Just too strange without a trigger guard.

It is cool looking but I will stick with my Hammer of the Gods (aka 47 Walker)
 
Not as long as they are relying on Model Ts and Wright flyers for transportation.

Ask a stupid question; get a stupid answer.
Well you posted a rather silly opinion on that one. My main comment was on the original design and the fact that it wasn't particularly robust.
 
No one in their right mind would consider any muzzle loading firearm to be a "daily driver", any more a Model T or a Wright flyer would be. They are interesting and fascinating relics and reproductions of another era. Nothing more than that.
Carried a C&B for years as a 'daily driver' and never felt at a disadvantage. My very first was a .36 cal. original Confederate Colt that I picked up in a pawn shop. Eventually had to replace it because it needed repaired and 'modern' parts would work. Then a .44 Remington. Various .44 Colt copies. Never once felt under armed. Occasionally carry my most recent, a .44 fully fluted cylinder when I feel whimsical or nostalgic. Though it is somewhat bulky and difficult to conceal. Though limited in available ammo and slow to reload, it is never-the less reliable. Even when carrying a high capacity auto-loader, I've never had to engage more than 2-3 targets at a time. So, 6 rounds have always been enough for the 'bad ass' wanna bes that I've encountered from time to time.
 
Back
Top