I agree. There were four (4) grades of powder in use by the military in the 19th Century; Musket, Mortar, Cannon and Mammoth.
In granulating, 2 sieves were used for each powder. This was a "pass, don't pass" system as follows:
Musket Powder- None should pass through sieve No. 1; all through No. 2
Mortar Powder- None should pass through No. 2; all through No. 3
Cannon Powder- None should pass through No. 4; all through No. 5.
Mammoth Powder- None should pass through No. 6; all through No. 7.
Diameter of holes in sieves for granulating powder:
No. 1- 0.03 in.
No. 2- 0.06 in.
No. 3- 0.01 in.
No. 4- 0.25 in.
No. 5- 0.35 in.
No. 6- 0.6 in.
No. 7- 0.9 in.
Notice that the small diameter for cannon powder is 1/4 inch, and that the large diameter for Mammoth Powder is an inch in size!
1F powder actually is more of a mortar powder. There is a very fine line between the granulation of the larger 2F grains and the smallest 1F grains. Not every grain of powder is exactly the same size as the one next to it. Also, powder grains get crushed while loading even if the ball isn't rammed hard. Pull a load sometime and check it out.
1F will work quite well in a large bore musket, although my best results are with 2F. I'm puzzled by the comments I've read over the past several months about the coarser powders fouling more. I've never experienced that myself and the Ordnance Dept. officers who conducted trials with the new muskets actually said that the opposite was true with the rifle powders (3F). They concluded to stick with musket powder because the barrels tended to foul worse with the rifle powder. I personally haven't seen any difference in the powders, but I have noticed that bullet size and type of lube did have somewhat of a bearing on the amount of fouling and the ease of removal.