Now a little more of that attitude would be nice to see around the country,it might just put Toby and friends out of buisness.
at one time it was legal in Idaho. i shot an elk there with my 451 Whitworth and a 490 gr. slug, got total penetration.Idaho Ron said:Not in Idaho. I have a 475 gr bullet for my 45 and that would be MORE than enough. I think that Idaho should have a minimum weight for a bullet and do away with the cal restriction. Ron
KHickam said:Amen to that - I just surfed his BLOG - All I can say is I couldn't believe what he was saying.
:barf: :bull: :idunno:
451whitworth said:at one time it was legal in Idaho. i shot an elk there with my 451 Whitworth and a 490 gr. slug, got total penetration.Idaho Ron said:Not in Idaho. I have a 475 gr bullet for my 45 and that would be MORE than enough. I think that Idaho should have a minimum weight for a bullet and do away with the cal restriction. Ron
The Elk in Washington are smaller that the Idaho Elk I do not remember the specific species name.
buttonbuck said:Jerimiah Johnson did it with a 36 cal cuz that was all he could get in Missouri. By this logic I can use a 32 cal maxi ball on white tail deer but Illinois requires a 45 for deer, personally I use a 54 for Illinois deer. Remember that the Elk in Washington state compared to the Elk in Idaho are different sub species. The Elk in Washington are smaller that the Idaho Elk I do not remember the specific species name.
tg said:Most states probably look at the common ML projectiles which woud be the ball,and not consider the long heavier bullets,as most ML hunts were set up so one steps back in technology and range of the weapon so to be much less effective than the centerfires, some folks just don't "get" this concept, but that is another thread or two of its own.
Yer right, aint no minimum caliber in Tejas for any muzzle loaders. Lil light for elk, but it can be done.KHickam said:Yes, as far as I can tell - TX has no minimum caliber muzzleloader requirement. :thumbsup:
that bullet was the Lyman mould that came with the 1st gen. PH whitworth over 90grs. of Pyrodex RS and the year was 1995. it was in the Lost River Range east of Challis, ID. the shot was on a 5x6 bull at 60 yards quatering towards and that slug broke the shoulder/leg, took off the top of the heart, got the lungs, went through the paunch and exited the ham. he tried to stagger but just crumpled. my friend who lived in Idaho was with me holding my T/C Renegade .58 and as we approached, the bull started kicking and he put a PRB into the chest as insurance. the other thing that stays with me about that hunt was how freakin' heavy that rifle was in those mountainsIdaho Ron said:451whitworth said:at one time it was legal in Idaho. i shot an elk there with my 451 Whitworth and a 490 gr. slug, got total penetration.Idaho Ron said:Not in Idaho. I have a 475 gr bullet for my 45 and that would be MORE than enough. I think that Idaho should have a minimum weight for a bullet and do away with the cal restriction. Ron
I want more info!!! What bullet, you know the drill. Man I would have liked to have been there just to see that. Now I am jealous!!! :hatsoff: :hatsoff: Ron
actually most states don't look at it that way TG. i understand where you are coming from and the western states that have those rules. elk and mule deer populations don't bounce back as fast as whitetails. and I "get" the concept and personally feel that my 16 bore RB gun and my .451 Whitworth are about equal in range and game taking ability. i.e. i would take the same shot with either rifle out to 125-150 yards max depending on conditions.tg said:Most states probably look at the common ML projectiles which woud be the ball,and not consider the long heavier bullets,as most ML hunts were set up so one steps back in technology and range of the weapon so to be much less effective than the centerfires, some folks just don't "get" this concept, but that is another thread or two of its own.
Enter your email address to join: