5 1/2 inch barrel Colts

[PaulN/KS]

Saw in the Midway catalog that they have the 5 1/2inch barrel Colts by Pietta,both fluted and non-fluted cylinders.Any major differance due to the fluting ie: strength?Thinking about getting one but thought I'd ask the forum about it first.Best regards,Paul

 

[crockett]

Remember the saying a chain is no stronger than its weakest link? If the cylinder notch or bolt leade is over a chamber, that's your weak spot, adding metal between the flutes looks good but adds little to nothing for strength. Some of the modern revolvers that have no flutes also have off set cylinder notches or bolt leades. If you like flutes, get that style and be happy.

 

[montanadan]

PaulN/KS-I would probably go for the fluted cylinders if the caliber was 36,but with new metals being used today,probably does not matter.One thing that does matter is the length of the loading lever,it will be shorter,less mechanical advantage(harder to load).I have 51's with 5" barrels(36 cal,Uberti's)and .380 rb can be tough without an extension on the loading lever,44's will be tougher.Just some food for thought...Respectfully Montanadan

 

[PaulN/KS]

Thanks for the input guys. :thanks:

 

[gordy]

Didn't Colt carry this weakness over into all their cartridge guns? If I recall correctly, Ruger used this in their adds (moveing the leads) to give greater strength and the nonfluted cylinders on the Blackhawk series (.44 Mag.and .357Mag..) The lack of flutes took awhile for people to accept.IMO the lead location and the fluted cylinder shouldn't be a safety concern,I doubt You could pack enough Black Powder in those chambers to burst the walls.I'd get the style that pleased Me.Good luck. :imo: :front: