Col. Batguano
75 Cal.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 5,039
- Reaction score
- 1,422
I was talking with the NRA yesterday about trying to get the BSA (Boy Scout Division) to open up flint locks to Boy Scouts. (Currently they're only allowed in the Venture Scout Division). They told me that the accident incident rate is many times higher in flint locks than it is with percussion guns. Is this true?
The additional sources of an accident (using flint vs. percussion) I can think of are;
1.) Bystander standing “downstream” from the touch hole at discharge, and being hit by hot gas.
2.) Greater propensity to have hang-fires
3.) The use of real black powder having a lower flash point than substitutes, and ease of ignition in the bore from a remaining ember
4.) Loading with a flint engaging a closed frizzen, and a spark igniting some of the powder that can trickle out the touch hole during the loading of the main charge and seating the ball.
5.) A lock blowing off due to the bolster not being seated tightly against the barrel flats, and powder getting behind it (pretty rare).
6.) More powder spillage in the shooting area, and greater likelihood of the open pan flash igniting exposed or uncovered powder in or out of containers
Are there more? Which of these above are the greatest source of accidents? I don't count as additional risk of people doing dumb things that would be dumb with ANY firearm.
Of course, a program is only as safe as the people administering it, and, the vast majority of Scout range leaders have little to no experience with ML'ers, so they sort of have to go (for safety's sake) with the lowest common denominator, which is why they say percussion guns (all forms including the icky ones we don't talk about here) only on the Boy Scout side. And, the median age for Boy Scouts is around 13, so most of their experiences with a ML'er will be their first one ever. Same with the adults sadly enough.
The additional sources of an accident (using flint vs. percussion) I can think of are;
1.) Bystander standing “downstream” from the touch hole at discharge, and being hit by hot gas.
2.) Greater propensity to have hang-fires
3.) The use of real black powder having a lower flash point than substitutes, and ease of ignition in the bore from a remaining ember
4.) Loading with a flint engaging a closed frizzen, and a spark igniting some of the powder that can trickle out the touch hole during the loading of the main charge and seating the ball.
5.) A lock blowing off due to the bolster not being seated tightly against the barrel flats, and powder getting behind it (pretty rare).
6.) More powder spillage in the shooting area, and greater likelihood of the open pan flash igniting exposed or uncovered powder in or out of containers
Are there more? Which of these above are the greatest source of accidents? I don't count as additional risk of people doing dumb things that would be dumb with ANY firearm.
Of course, a program is only as safe as the people administering it, and, the vast majority of Scout range leaders have little to no experience with ML'ers, so they sort of have to go (for safety's sake) with the lowest common denominator, which is why they say percussion guns (all forms including the icky ones we don't talk about here) only on the Boy Scout side. And, the median age for Boy Scouts is around 13, so most of their experiences with a ML'er will be their first one ever. Same with the adults sadly enough.