You might want to be careful using terms like ".50 bore" around muzzleloaders.
If you say it rather than write it, people won't hear the decimal point. All they'll hear is "50 bore".
Back in the 18th and 19th century, muzzleloaders were described by the number of balls per pound they shot. That is, a "50 bore" shot a ball that weighed 1/50th of a pound or put another way, a pound of these balls would have 50 balls in it.
Likewise, a "45 bore" would be a gun that shot balls which would be 1/45th of a pound or, there would be 45 of these balls in a pound.
To add to the confusion, a 45 bore ball is .469 in diameter. A 50 bore ball is .453 in diameter.
A .492 diameter ball like we would shoot in a patched ball load in a .50 caliber barrel would be a "39 balls per pound" and a .531 diameter like we would shoot in a patched load in a .54 caliber barrel would be a "31 balls per pound".
Now, to get even more confused, as you might have noticed, in the example I just mentioned, a patched ball load uses a undersized ball. That is, a .50 caliber barrel shoots a .490 diameter ball. A .45 caliber barrel usually shoots a .440 diameter ball.
Although the ball they shoot is smaller than a ball that represents the bore size, it is the bore size ball that is used to describe the size of the bore.
If your confused, your not alone.
Several authors of historical works seemed to confuse the balls per pound and the ball size in inches so we get authors saying some famous person shot a .36 caliber rifle when he should have said the person shot a 36 bore rifle. (There's a lot of difference between a .36 caliber ball and a .506 diameter, 36 balls per pound ball.)
Probably best to just use the term "caliber" rather than "bore" to avoid any confusion.