SITUATION
I've read articles about and watched reenactors perform what I understand to be a safety practice when swabbing a cannon after it's been fired.
As I understand it, the pressure from the bore swab being rammed down the bore forces a stream of exhaust, powder residue, possibly unburned powder & embers out the vent into the air where there is more fresh oxygen than inside the breech.
There is a practice where one of the artillery men holds his thumb over the vent to seal it, preventing the stream of residue from exiting the vent into the oxygen rich outside air.
The purpose of preventing the residue from exiting the vent is to prevent any possible re-ignition of this stream of residue when it hits the oxygen rich air, which could then track backwards through the stream into the vent/breech, possibly setting off a larger re-ignition of unburned powder that may still in the breech/bore, injuring/killing the man in front of the muzzle, etc.
TWO QUESTIONS:
Q1) Is this true?
Q2) If so, how is the cannon situation different from a fired flintlock, with respect to either blowing down the bore which forces hot residue out it's vent or ramming a patch down the bore which forces hot residue out it's vent?
I've read articles about and watched reenactors perform what I understand to be a safety practice when swabbing a cannon after it's been fired.
As I understand it, the pressure from the bore swab being rammed down the bore forces a stream of exhaust, powder residue, possibly unburned powder & embers out the vent into the air where there is more fresh oxygen than inside the breech.
There is a practice where one of the artillery men holds his thumb over the vent to seal it, preventing the stream of residue from exiting the vent into the oxygen rich outside air.
The purpose of preventing the residue from exiting the vent is to prevent any possible re-ignition of this stream of residue when it hits the oxygen rich air, which could then track backwards through the stream into the vent/breech, possibly setting off a larger re-ignition of unburned powder that may still in the breech/bore, injuring/killing the man in front of the muzzle, etc.
TWO QUESTIONS:
Q1) Is this true?
Q2) If so, how is the cannon situation different from a fired flintlock, with respect to either blowing down the bore which forces hot residue out it's vent or ramming a patch down the bore which forces hot residue out it's vent?