DuncNZ
54 Cal.
First off Good morning and Happy Christmas , It is 10.30 am on Christmas day here in New Zealand 25 C or 77 F warm and sunny , everyone is off to the beach or back yard for a barbeque .
Any way I was looking at a photo of an original Hawken breach and the amount of wear caused by cap splatter caught my attention .
Over 35 years I have fired thousands of rounds out of a Hawken copy and it never showed any damage from cap splatter .
This got me wondering why? I would imagine that a Beaver trapper , away from access to supplies and in country where the locals often had hostile intent , where a shot could attract unwanted attention , would only fire his rifle to get food or in self defense ,probably less than a hundred times a year, not a lot of shots compared with a modern target shooter .
I guess the priming compound or cap construction would be the culprit . Any one done a study on cap development ? is there a difference between then and now ?
Any way I was looking at a photo of an original Hawken breach and the amount of wear caused by cap splatter caught my attention .
Over 35 years I have fired thousands of rounds out of a Hawken copy and it never showed any damage from cap splatter .
This got me wondering why? I would imagine that a Beaver trapper , away from access to supplies and in country where the locals often had hostile intent , where a shot could attract unwanted attention , would only fire his rifle to get food or in self defense ,probably less than a hundred times a year, not a lot of shots compared with a modern target shooter .
I guess the priming compound or cap construction would be the culprit . Any one done a study on cap development ? is there a difference between then and now ?