• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Cap Splatter

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

DuncNZ

54 Cal.
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Messages
1,507
Reaction score
2,354
Location
Trout Country New Zealand
First off Good morning and Happy Christmas , It is 10.30 am on Christmas day here in New Zealand 25 C or 77 F warm and sunny , everyone is off to the beach or back yard for a barbeque .
Any way I was looking at a photo of an original Hawken breach and the amount of wear caused by cap splatter caught my attention .
Over 35 years I have fired thousands of rounds out of a Hawken copy and it never showed any damage from cap splatter .
This got me wondering why? I would imagine that a Beaver trapper , away from access to supplies and in country where the locals often had hostile intent , where a shot could attract unwanted attention , would only fire his rifle to get food or in self defense ,probably less than a hundred times a year, not a lot of shots compared with a modern target shooter .
I guess the priming compound or cap construction would be the culprit . Any one done a study on cap development ? is there a difference between then and now ?
 
First off Good morning and Happy Christmas , It is 10.30 am on Christmas day here in New Zealand 25 C or 77 F warm and sunny , everyone is off to the beach or back yard for a barbeque .
Any way I was looking at a photo of an original Hawken breach and the amount of wear caused by cap splatter caught my attention .
Over 35 years I have fired thousands of rounds out of a Hawken copy and it never showed any damage from cap splatter .
This got me wondering why? I would imagine that a Beaver trapper , away from access to supplies and in country where the locals often had hostile intent , where a shot could attract unwanted attention , would only fire his rifle to get food or in self defense ,probably less than a hundred times a year, not a lot of shots compared with a modern target shooter .
I guess the priming compound or cap construction would be the culprit . Any one done a study on cap development ? is there a difference between then and now ?
Merry Christmas my Kiwi neighbour. G’day from Queensland

That erosion/spackling/dimpling that is seen on the breech of many old guns I believe is from them not being sufficiently cleaned before storage, or before being found in-situ. At least that’s my considered opinion.
Back then caps used mercury fulminate, which is corrosive as hell. Also considering that iron/steel used in those barrels was softer than nowadays, they would have corroded easier.
 
Ile translate the above comments 'chilly bin' fairly obvious.' Jandles' are flip flops .' Cool as ' is a premier to' good as any thing you can think of ' Chur probably means Sure, .Bro being' brother . & 'choice means' he likes it . You cant buy many lollies for tin cints . & if you want fizzy drinks you need to ask for' lolly water' . after many years I can speak' Strine' with the help of a' pig' on my nose .
Yours levitatiously.fond
Regards Rudyard
 
They weren't all mercury. Chlorate priming was known almost from the beginning. Just as corrosive though. It's what the Prime-all is based on.
 
Old school priming compound was about as corrosive as it gets. Not cleaning immediately after firing gets it started.
 
Back
Top