- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 7,027
- Reaction score
- 5,248
Anybody here experiencing problems with ignition of CCI #11 percussion caps? Specifically with the Ruger Old Army. Over here in yUK beggars can't be chosers, so I have to go with the flow and buy whatever percussion caps the local dealer has - or do a 90 mile drive around to get something else at $13.50 a gallon of gas.
I don't recall ever having any kind of a problem before with CCI caps, until today. A VERY busy day with a lot of noobs, all clamouring to shoot a REAL handgun.
I noticed, as I'm a model engineer who builds live steam trains, that the latest batch seemed to be kind of 'flimsier' that I recalled them to be, but put it down to old age and general decrepitude - after all, all six went off when I capped off.
That, however, was the very last time that all six went off sequentially all day long.
Thereafter, at least two out of six and finally, five out of six, failed to fire first time, but after a suitable safety wait, fired the second time. When the bits from those that HAD gone off didn't jam up the gun, that is. THAT had never happened before, either. They DID seem flimsier in contruction than I remember, as a look at an old one I found in my defunct in-line capper clearly showed me.
As you all know, the design of the ROA is such that the hammer does not actually impact the nipple, but strikes the frame instead if there is no cap in place, enabling you to dry-fire the gun without any damage to the nipples. I opine that the thing construction of these caps was not 'making up the difference' in the gap with sufficient bulk to permit a good strike...
I'd be interested to hear what anybody else has to say, even to the point of telling me that I've gotten it all wrong [again].
Whinemeal, I have nine unopened tins........
tac
Supporter of the Cape Meares Lighthouse Restoration Fund
I don't recall ever having any kind of a problem before with CCI caps, until today. A VERY busy day with a lot of noobs, all clamouring to shoot a REAL handgun.
I noticed, as I'm a model engineer who builds live steam trains, that the latest batch seemed to be kind of 'flimsier' that I recalled them to be, but put it down to old age and general decrepitude - after all, all six went off when I capped off.
That, however, was the very last time that all six went off sequentially all day long.
Thereafter, at least two out of six and finally, five out of six, failed to fire first time, but after a suitable safety wait, fired the second time. When the bits from those that HAD gone off didn't jam up the gun, that is. THAT had never happened before, either. They DID seem flimsier in contruction than I remember, as a look at an old one I found in my defunct in-line capper clearly showed me.
As you all know, the design of the ROA is such that the hammer does not actually impact the nipple, but strikes the frame instead if there is no cap in place, enabling you to dry-fire the gun without any damage to the nipples. I opine that the thing construction of these caps was not 'making up the difference' in the gap with sufficient bulk to permit a good strike...
I'd be interested to hear what anybody else has to say, even to the point of telling me that I've gotten it all wrong [again].
Whinemeal, I have nine unopened tins........
tac
Supporter of the Cape Meares Lighthouse Restoration Fund