ghost said:
2. Beer over cider was a result of the polluted water in the urban areas. Beer was boiled during brewing and therefore safer to consume than water and easier to produce in large quantities for the family or public.
Very interesting. That's one theory I've not encountered before. I would be not at all surprised if that did indeed play a role.
It could be drank "green" with no need for aging like good cider required.
I disagree with that statement. I believe that cider has a much stronger tradition of being consumed green than does beer. Traditional ciders were/are generally ready for consumption within days of pressing.
In it's heyday in the US, cider was often served right from the vessel it fermented in. It was not a bottled beverage. I think that practice of drinking it live began disappearing from the world of ale long before it did from cider.
Sure, in France they age ciders, but that has not been typical for the farmhouse varieties.
Nowadays, of course, neither commercial beers nor commercial ciders are consumed green. Force carbonation, filtration, and preservatives are used to speed up the process, but they're still mature products.
Cider was a seasonal drink depending on the presence of a good crop of apples.
I don't get the impression that that has traditionally been the case. Many cider apple varieties are selected for their storage characteristics. It's my understanding that the beverage could be made throughout the year.
There just wern't enough apples for cider to be anyone's national drink.
This I also disagree with. The US had a lot of farmland devoted to orchards. And nearly all of that was devoted to cider production. (Apples for eating or cooking was a small side product of the cider industry, not vice versa.) Most eastern and midwestern orchards vanished when the cider market changed.
Although we have quite a number of commercial apple orchards operating in the US, you would be hard-pressed to find any growing traditional cider variety apples.
The best of hard ciders required a good frost on the barrels which restricted the drink to a seasonal beverage.
It's true that traditional cider doesn't have as good a shelf life as beer. The lack of boiling and the low alcohol content leave it much more prone to spoilage.
I think another thing that played a role is storage and distribution of the ingredients. Barley, once malted and dried, can survive a lot of abuse. You can roughly toss a 100# sack into a freightcar and, as long as it stays dry and doesn't get much over about 100 degrees F, the necessary active enzymes are still okay.
Apples, on the other hand, begin to spoil almost immediately with every little bruise and they can't tolerate conditions above room temperature (and even that not very well). Not much of a problem when it's just a short wagon ride from your orchard to the pressing mill. But if there's a bumpy trainride in there, forget it.
From the mid-19th century on, the trend in the industry was toward larger regional breweries over small local ones. That meant transporting the ingredients. The fragility of apples would have largely prevented cidermakers from enjoying the economies of scale achieved by their barley-based counterparts.
It also required a surplus of "good" apples, where beer/ale could have various flavors added to cover a rough batch.
I'm not so sure that was true a century or more ago. Quality cider could be made with some pretty ugly, wormy apples. And, as I mentioned above, cider was not a surplus product of orchards, it was the *primary* product.
Nowadays, we have breweries like Miller and AB who can take whatever cheap, low-quality barley they can find on the market and doctor it up to ensure that each batch is as tasteless as the last. This technique has been applied to produced fake, mass-market hard ciders like Hornsby's, Woodchuck, Mike's Hard, and Hardcore.
Dang, I'm gettin' thirsty!
Dan