I would certainly not argue that the computer generated ballastic charts would strongly give the edge to the 45cal. I am sure I am singing to the choir :yakyak: But fellars the sectional denisity and the longer conical shape of the projectile.....blobity blobity
[url] blobity....ain[/url]'t got nothing to do with the downrange effectiveness of the 45cal. in the type of guns we are talkin about,which is muzzleloaders. If you gonna stuff one of them [we ain't suppose to mention] guns full of pellets and plastic and solid copper and telescope in on something ...well you might get something done on paper. The fact is that the lighter the projectile,the faster it sheds velosity...And fellars...especially you Roundball,[good friend], we depend on mass not
[url] velosity...in[/url] our LINE [notice I didn't say the word] of firearms. Now if there has been some new developments and discoveries that have shaken these basic truths...then, please post it on here so we can all get a look at it. Not saying you can't drill nice straight holes with your 45cal. but, I wouldn't celebrate with them bears and buffalo and elk and moose. And with iron sights in low light [HUNTING], most of us are maxed out on range inside of 100 yards. To put it simply, the bigger gun is better. But, that's just me! :thumbsup:
adios