Wink said:I've noticed that a number of GMUs in Colorado display that evidence of CWD has been found there. What if anything, do you successful hunters do as a precaution with Elk and Deer harvested within CWD units?
I've noticed that a number of GMUs in Colorado display that evidence of CWD has been found there. What if anything, do you successful hunters do as a precaution with Elk and Deer harvested within CWD units?
marmotslayer said:I've noticed that a number of GMUs in Colorado display that evidence of CWD has been found there. What if anything, do you successful hunters do as a precaution with Elk and Deer harvested within CWD units?
I no longer bother with any precautions. A study that took in a 20 year period in the area of highest CWD presence showed no statistical variance with the random occurence of the various prion based brain diseases.
Brain diseases in humans such as Creutsfelt Jacob (spelling on that one!) occur at a known rate and appear to be spontaneous. IOW, they got no idea what causes it! In the above study area with a very high rate of CWD 70% of the deer are killed by residents of the unit. Given that, if CWD were passed on to humans, the rate of these brain diseases should have had a higher incidence rate in theat geographic area. Over the 20 year study period they did not.
Have they even found CWD in elk in CO?
marmotslayer said:Have they even found CWD in elk in CO?
Yup. For sure in Rocky Mountain Natl Park and a few other units that I don't recall offhand. Since they started mandatory moose cwd checking I think they found CWD in moose too.
Nothing in antelope, but then they are a good bit separated species wise from deer, elk and moose.
My lack of concern is not over whether or not it could be there, but rather because I'm certain it is not a health risk for humans. Having the prion is one thing but having the prion go "active" (or whatever they call it) are two different things. Once it goes active, the animal will die within about two weeks. I would not consume or even shoot a deer or elk that was obviously sick with anything. But the disease does not have to be ongoing to be transmittable to another animal. They can carry the prion for years without any sign of disease and then suddenly it goes active and they are dead shortly thereafter.
Here's another diddy for you. In the language of CWD testing, there is no such thing as "negative". They term it either "detected" or "not detected". The distinction here being a bit of CYA on the part of DOW. "negative" can be construed to mean it is not there. "Not detected" simply states that the disease was not found, but not that it definitively was not there! Even so, "negative" term is still commonly used by us non-bureaucrats. :haha:
I expect that you know all this, having been involved in testing around Gunnison, but I'm just throwing it out for the benefit of other board members in case it might be useful.
Enter your email address to join: