Um... unless you are hunting coyotes, bigger is always better, but .45 caliber is generally NOT thought of as a "larger bore", though you are grammatically correct in that it IS larger than .36 caliber. LD gave you good advice I think, especially if you choose to hunt with a patched round ball. I've never tried bismuth in a muzzleloader, but I would never consider steel shot for waterfowl. I'm not the best shot these days, so I'm gonna suggest even bigger, say .54 caliber. From what I have heard and seen personally, deer don't run too far shot with a .54 lead round ball and bismuth is pretty close in weight. Larger calibers generally shoot more accurately as well, though this depends somewhat on the shooter's resistance to recoil.
With a .50 or .54 round ball, 70 grains is probably enough, but some go to 90 grains or even higher. My advice is not to go higher than 70 grains, but I am a wimp, not even brave enough to visit the Land of Fruits and Nuts. Once planned to visit a friend out there, but Mae Ling was a smart girl and moved to another state some while back.
I wonder if anyone in Kalifornia has tried to use a patched steel ball bearing. I bet it would work at close range with a double-patched smoothbore. Wonder what accuracy would be like with that. Hmmmmm.... maybe I'll give it a shot. Now, if I could only find a .690 ball bearing.
With a .50 or .54 round ball, 70 grains is probably enough, but some go to 90 grains or even higher. My advice is not to go higher than 70 grains, but I am a wimp, not even brave enough to visit the Land of Fruits and Nuts. Once planned to visit a friend out there, but Mae Ling was a smart girl and moved to another state some while back.
I wonder if anyone in Kalifornia has tried to use a patched steel ball bearing. I bet it would work at close range with a double-patched smoothbore. Wonder what accuracy would be like with that. Hmmmmm.... maybe I'll give it a shot. Now, if I could only find a .690 ball bearing.