Finished load development this morning for a dove load in my GM .54cal Flint smoothbore barrel, and had a surprising change of pattern when I switched wiping/lubing regimen.
I had settled on a load that throws a terrific pattern of 7.5's at 30yds...70grns Goex 3F and two Oxyoke wonderwads. Wiped after every shot with both sides of a patch well dampened with TC #13 cleaner, followed by a patch lubed with TC NL1000.
As I was nearing the end of the session it occurred to me that I could save a step in the dove field by just using both side of a Hoppes No9 PLUS patch which is a cleaning AND lubing solution (it always gave excellent results with PRBs) and not have to use two different patches with #13 and NL1000 out in the field.
Only about 25% of the pattern even hit the paper.
Shocked, I thought, OK I screwed something up, let me try this again...same results...most of the pattern was missing from the paper...as if a major POI shift was occurring. Went back to the #13 & NL1000 regimen, and the perfect pattern was right back where it had been.
Trying to figure out what happened...the Hoppes patches were not 'wet', just a normal damp so there wasn't anything excessive about it. And even if there was, the pair of Oxyoke wads would have wiped any excess off the bore walls.
I was tired by then and didn't want to essentially start all through a re-adjustment series to find out where the pattern was and left things the way they were with a known excellent pattern, but evidently requiring these particular wiping/lubing steps for consistency.
Intriging though...any ideas?
I had settled on a load that throws a terrific pattern of 7.5's at 30yds...70grns Goex 3F and two Oxyoke wonderwads. Wiped after every shot with both sides of a patch well dampened with TC #13 cleaner, followed by a patch lubed with TC NL1000.
As I was nearing the end of the session it occurred to me that I could save a step in the dove field by just using both side of a Hoppes No9 PLUS patch which is a cleaning AND lubing solution (it always gave excellent results with PRBs) and not have to use two different patches with #13 and NL1000 out in the field.
Only about 25% of the pattern even hit the paper.
Shocked, I thought, OK I screwed something up, let me try this again...same results...most of the pattern was missing from the paper...as if a major POI shift was occurring. Went back to the #13 & NL1000 regimen, and the perfect pattern was right back where it had been.
Trying to figure out what happened...the Hoppes patches were not 'wet', just a normal damp so there wasn't anything excessive about it. And even if there was, the pair of Oxyoke wads would have wiped any excess off the bore walls.
I was tired by then and didn't want to essentially start all through a re-adjustment series to find out where the pattern was and left things the way they were with a known excellent pattern, but evidently requiring these particular wiping/lubing steps for consistency.
Intriging though...any ideas?