Excluding modern muzzleloaders isnt just "excluding the guns," its excluding PEOPLE. And yeah, I have, in this context, an issue with that.
Except for excluding them.
What is the "problem" that has been made worse? Stats dont lie; there are less hunters today. Because of that, licences cost more for people who do hunt, but it's way bigger than that. Hunting and fishing licence sales and taxes on guns, ammo, etc comprises the lions share of money that manages our parks, wilderness areas, fisheries, preserves, etc. on both the state and federal level. I have 2 teenagers who go to one of the biggest high schools in Ohio. I've taken my son hunting every year since he was 10(hes 18 now). I've asked him how many other kids he knows at school who hunt and he can count them on his fingers...out of 3300 kids! THATS a problem! If hunter numbers keep falling, what will happen to fund that deficiency in money(not to mention MORE expensive licences and taxes)is: land sales, logging, further oil/gas drilling etc on public land, etc. Which results in less land to hunt on, less habitat for game, less land management, more wildfires, more crumbling park infrastructure, and so on. Or EVERYONES taxes will go up. Lose lose, not to mention higher car insurance rates from increased deer strikes, higher produce prices from agricultural loss.
We NEED the next generation of anglers and hunters, way more than most people and govt officials will admit. Whatever gets them in the woods and on the water, I support.
Even inlines.