Hi Folks,
I think RicM is just asking about the pros and cons of the Pedersoli Bess repro because he may have an option on one. I don't think he is looking for other ideas or options. RicM, please correct me if I am wrong about that. I asked RicM why he wanted the Bess not to question his desire for one but because it is directly relevant to the objective assessment of the pros and cons of a Pedersoli Bess. If someone wants a Bess-like gun just to shoot and have in their collection, the Pedersolis are fine. They almost always need tweaking to make them shoot well but that is not too big a deal. However, they are pricey compared with the other India-made guns that would probably serve such a use just as well if you buy it from a reputable dealer like Loyalist Arms. If you want a hunting gun, IMO the Pedersoli is not a good choice. It will serve the purpose but for many folks it won't fit because the stock is very straight, and it is heavy and clumsy. Finally, if you want one for reenacting and are concerned with historical accuracy you have a problem. The Pedersoli is not historically accurate, never was, and if the latest kit gun I helped complete for a friend is an indication, the new Besses are even less historically correct. For example, they now use the top jaw screw from the pattern 1777 with the hole and the sear hole is drilled too low in the lock plate.
dave