Hunters are now conditioned to look for orange no orange safe to shoot.Was the archer wrong? Not if he was legal. Was he irresponsible? If the season was open for rifles..... absolutely!
Yes the shooter was an ***** for not identifying his target, and so was the archer for wearing camo in a gun season.
Now the guys life, who shot him, is ruined! All because someone wanted to be cool ..... when it make no difference because the deer/elk can't see orange anyway.
Having been shot while rabbit hunting, I can tell you that the guy who shot me was an *****, I was wearing orange. Having had multiple surgeries, having been grilled when I went in the service as to how I got shot, and having seen what it did to the guy who shot me. I will wear as much orange as I feasibly can any time I am in the woods during a gun season.
Sounds to me the father was conditioned to look for orange. No orange ok to shoot. Instead of positivity identifying his target.Last year in Ohio, a man killed his son on their own property which they have hunted exclusively forever.
He admitted he shot at movement and said without question it would not have happened if his son had been wearing orange.
Both are to blame.
Unless you believe that a dumb person, who would shoot at movement, doesn't exist, you are risking your life for absolutely nothing.
had a guy in our area years ago . That I found out sound and sight hunted.. his buddy’s would not go anywhere near him. I was at there house one day. Guy sayhow did you do today. I answered nothing. He says I had 2 sound and I sight . I’m what?Find out he shot twice at sound and once at something that moved!!!!
I've never heard of sound shooting. Pretty sure my dad would have beaten me down the mountainside for something that reckless and irresponsible.
When wearing orange is required. It gives some hunters a "false sense of security " thinking that if it doesn't have orange it must not be another hunter. My wife and I spend a lot of time in the woods, hiking, exploring, picking mushrooms etc. mostly in the national forest. Should we and other forest users be required to ware orange? Should forest workers, game officers, grandpa Joe walking his dog, "your grand kids at the bus stop" be required to ware orange during some hunting season that we may or may not know is going on? Or should we hold the person behind the trigger responsible for his/her actions? I know it's too late to say "I shoulda" after some dum bass has done something stupid but where does this stop.
You tell me. I'm primarily a bird hunter. I've walked past people in tree stands never new they were there until I was almost on top of them. Last year, I passed a bowhunter on the ground in full camo, didnt see him until I was 10 yards away. If they dont let me know where they are, and a bird flushes and I shoot and hit them, whose fault is it? Am I supposed to have some 6th sense to be aware of unseen hunters?Or should we hold the person behind the trigger responsible for his/her actions? I know it's too late to say "I shoulda" after some dum bass has done something stupid but where does this stop.
Enter your email address to join: