Black Hand
Cannon
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2005
- Messages
- 9,348
- Reaction score
- 896
A grease hole and a patch box are not equivalent, having different uses....
Black Hand said:A grease hole and a patch box are not equivalent, having different uses....
Black Hand said:A grease hole and a patch box are not equivalent, having different uses....
Yep! totally agree.....Kind of like building a grandfather clock with no guts.....Loyalist Dave said:But still, the patch box remains functional, does it not? What I mean is, do we find elaborate inlays in many rifles on the right side of the stock that are only decoration, and do not open in any way to a compartment underneath?
Seems even when it's a simple, wooden cover, to be a lot of work for something that isn't "functional"...(in one author's opinion) and barely an embellishment when they first appear...., so they had some function at some point.
LD
True .....BUT!...you can put grease in a patch or cap box but you can"t put anything but grease in a grease hole.....Black Hand said:A grease hole and a patch box are not equivalent, having different uses....
colorado clyde said:Now if a person wanted to argue the transformation of function to ornate artistry....That might be a better argument. :hmm:
Artificer said:He introduces the powder into the tube; springs the box of his gun, greases the "patch" over with some melted tallow, or damps it; then places it on the honey-combed muzzle of his piece.
colorado clyde said:True .....BUT!...you can put grease in a patch or cap box but you can"t put anything but grease in a grease hole.....Black Hand said:A grease hole and a patch box are not equivalent, having different uses....
The biggest problem I have found with patch boxes is when people put things other than patches or lube in them....
Am I understanding this to mean the grease was simply placed inside the patchbox or hole, right in contact with the wood without any sort of container? If so, that sounds a bit messy, and prone to running out on hot days.
Little Buffalo said:Artificer said:He introduces the powder into the tube; springs the box of his gun, greases the "patch" over with some melted tallow, or damps it; then places it on the honey-combed muzzle of his piece.
That sounds a bit awkward to me. Once the powder is poured into the barrel (tube), now the shooter must go to the other end of the rifle to retrieve the patch material in this case, risking dumping out the powder from the business end. Wouldn't it be more practical to first retrieve the patch material from the box before loading the rifle? But even in that case, you're still going back and forth from one end to the other of a long rifle.
Couldn't have said it better! Just get the giggles when the self-acclaimed experts start laying out unsubstantiated historical facts. No one knows it all...just fine tune your BS meter for sure. (Oh, by-the-by...the new PC term is MBBW!) :rotf:colorado clyde said:Like I said;
A clear case of personal bias.....The author clearly has a dislike for patch boxes and is using the book as a platform to voice his opinion and change public perception.....
Don't believe everything you read folks.....Turn on your :bull: meters......
colorado clyde said:Like I said;
A clear case of personal bias.....The author clearly has a dislike for patch boxes and is using the book as a platform to voice his opinion and change public perception.....
Don't believe everything you read folks.....Turn on your :bull: meters......
Enter your email address to join: