- Joined
- Dec 5, 2009
- Messages
- 271
- Reaction score
- 183
With my recent interest in Baker rifles for my edification I purchased British Military Flintlock Rifles, 1740-1840 by Dr. De Witt Bailey. Nice book, but among the chapter on accessories I came upon an interesting letter written about 11 years after the battle of Waterloo from the current company commander of the 95th Rifles requesting the reissue of loose powder, powder flasks, larger balls and greased patches so his men could get more accuracy from their rifles. It was interesting on two issues. First were the pre cut and pre lubes patches. At least in 1820 or so the British were not cutting or lubricating patches at the bore. The second more interesting tidbit was in the reply to the request for powder flasks. To paraphrase the flasks were removed from service early in the Peninsular War because of their repeated tendency to explode and injure men. This was the first time I have seen in writing a firsthand confirmation of the commonly held attitude that loading from a flask is dangerous.
The request was refused firstly because of the danger of flask detonation (soldiers of the time were known to dump the powder rather than risk losing a hand to the flask, but also because of fowling made follow up reloads difficult. Thus the Bakers and follow on rifles would be loaded with smaller balls (and later bore sized conical bullets) from paper cartridges.
The request was refused firstly because of the danger of flask detonation (soldiers of the time were known to dump the powder rather than risk losing a hand to the flask, but also because of fowling made follow up reloads difficult. Thus the Bakers and follow on rifles would be loaded with smaller balls (and later bore sized conical bullets) from paper cartridges.