My DA is from 2001.
I would like to read some of Eban Starr's notes on his revolvers and just what his intentions were.
I treat the revolver as a DA only. I use the primary trigger only.
If you drop the primary trigger spring, the one on the back, down it well stop the trigger with the hammer in a cocked position, then you can fire with the secondary trigger. I can't see any benefit in doing this. I tend to shoot all DA as DA only.
I'm curious about the arbor-less design. Did Eban design it that way with the intent of fast cylinder changes?
This is from those links I posted.
When properly adjusted a long smooth pull of the front trigger or cocking lever will push into and activate the real trigger behind it.
I think this is the way Starr intended the revolver to be fired, as a DA only revolver. Not a lot of historical info on it.
You wrote
In actuality the primary trigger is a true double action trigger and only pushes the secondary trigger out of the way during a double action cycle and fires the weapon in a manner very similar to modern double action revolvers.
I got lost on that. The primary trigger can only drop the hammer by activating the secondary trigger.
My SA Starr has it's own idiosyncrasies, like locking up anytime half **** is used. I'm not sure if that's from a Pietta design flaw or if the original was the same. Normally the six extra cylinder notches are used as a safety, but my SA Starr well lock up tight if you use them. I would like to see how an original works.