I've run across what might be a 40-rod gun from the mid-1800's (1840-1880) - but it also seems to have been made as more of a heavy sporter. I just don't know.
I still have a few questions, if anyone can help.
The .45 cal rifle, having a backaction lock and double set triggers, is marked in three lines as being made by "H.SOMERS", "BARNET", & "VT".
I traced two men named "H.Somers" , that were making guns between 1830-1880 in Barnet, Vermont, and believe they might be father/son - Hugh Somers (died ca.1873 @ age 72) & Henry Somers (died 1924).
I would opine that one of them made this rifle.
I would appreciate anything else I could learn of the makers - since although I found a tiny bit of bio info on them as the possible maker, I was unable to find anything about their guns.
Does anyone know how to distinguish a rifle betweem them ?
The wooden ramrod is plain, w/o tips, and is shorter than the barrel by a little over an inch - is it a wiping stick, or just a ramrod someone put on this rifle to make it look comlete ?
BTW - Since AFAIK the false muzzle idea was patented in 1840, I would presume this rifle (which is set up for one) is post-1840.
Ned H. Roberts mentioned a "H.SUMERS" of Barnet, VT in his book: The Muzzle-Loading Cap Lock Rifle - most likely a misprint/misspell, since the rifle is clearly marked.
I do not believe that the false muzzle, currently with this rifle, is original to the gun, since I thought that all such had a post that obstructed the sight picture while it was installed - to preclude shooting with it "on".
This false muzzle has no such device, nor any evidence that it once had one.
Could it be original, since it's rifled to match the barrel and the pins fit - although the pin holes were drilled completely through the false muzzle ?
Could this rifle has once been set up with an early telescopic sight, and used as a sniper rifle in the Civil War ?
I'm asking because the rear barrel sight dovetail has an old/period filler blank in it, and the peep is threaded into the more forward of two D/T'd holes about 1" apart in the upper tang, which MIGHT have been the location fpor the rear scope base.
I welcome any of your additional thought/comments.
.
I still have a few questions, if anyone can help.
The .45 cal rifle, having a backaction lock and double set triggers, is marked in three lines as being made by "H.SOMERS", "BARNET", & "VT".
I traced two men named "H.Somers" , that were making guns between 1830-1880 in Barnet, Vermont, and believe they might be father/son - Hugh Somers (died ca.1873 @ age 72) & Henry Somers (died 1924).
I would opine that one of them made this rifle.
I would appreciate anything else I could learn of the makers - since although I found a tiny bit of bio info on them as the possible maker, I was unable to find anything about their guns.
Does anyone know how to distinguish a rifle betweem them ?
The wooden ramrod is plain, w/o tips, and is shorter than the barrel by a little over an inch - is it a wiping stick, or just a ramrod someone put on this rifle to make it look comlete ?
BTW - Since AFAIK the false muzzle idea was patented in 1840, I would presume this rifle (which is set up for one) is post-1840.
Ned H. Roberts mentioned a "H.SUMERS" of Barnet, VT in his book: The Muzzle-Loading Cap Lock Rifle - most likely a misprint/misspell, since the rifle is clearly marked.
I do not believe that the false muzzle, currently with this rifle, is original to the gun, since I thought that all such had a post that obstructed the sight picture while it was installed - to preclude shooting with it "on".
This false muzzle has no such device, nor any evidence that it once had one.
Could it be original, since it's rifled to match the barrel and the pins fit - although the pin holes were drilled completely through the false muzzle ?
Could this rifle has once been set up with an early telescopic sight, and used as a sniper rifle in the Civil War ?
I'm asking because the rear barrel sight dovetail has an old/period filler blank in it, and the peep is threaded into the more forward of two D/T'd holes about 1" apart in the upper tang, which MIGHT have been the location fpor the rear scope base.
I welcome any of your additional thought/comments.
.