Restoration projects

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Xtramad

40 Cal.
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
I have devoted much of my time this last year to school so I havn't had much time for my flintlock project. Instead I have done a restoration project for a collector. I did take some pictures before I started but lost them when my computer crashed. The gun was a Norwegian 1774 drill musket in very poor shape. It had to be converted back to flintlock, needed a new main spring, the butt was in such poor shape that it had to be totally replaced with a butt from a similar donor musket, much of the wood also neded replacing and the owner wanted the stock panited to it's original black finish.
1774_rear_half.jpg
1774_lock.jpg


1774_butt.jpg
1774_wrist.jpg

The stock was spliced at the wrist. Paint was made from boiled linseed oil, asphaltum and soot. Eight layers of paint was applied, the first of these was warm asphalt to bind the paint to the allready oiled wood.


1774_frizzen.jpg

A hammer, frizzen, flashpan, main spring, top jaw, frizzen screw and frizzen spring were made from scratch using original parts as models. Smaller screws were taken from the donor musket. Ramrod tubes from the donor muskett were installed and all the pins were made new.
 
I have been given a new restoration project. This musket has a unique lock designed by the Danish armourer Kyhl.
It has fewer parts than a conventional flintlock, but dosen't seem to have any other features that would make it better. The flash guard is nice though. :thumbsup:
kyhl_mounted.jpg
kyhl_lock.jpg

kyhl_inside.jpg
kyhl_flashguard.jpg
 
Fascinating.
I assume the shield at the end of the pan is to prevent the vent flash from charring the guy next to the shooter?
Seems like the British should have thought of something like it with their Bess. (I haven't seen any documentation that the modern brass attachments that mount under the frizzen screw were ever used by the British in the 1700s.)

You say you use the original screws? Were these made with a thread that is currently available or do you have to make special taps for them? ::
 
The shield is easy to flip up out of the way for loading.

The screws have threads that are similar to British Standard Witworth. Close enough to fit but not exactly alike. The frizzen screw was filed by hand though the hole was tapped, I regretfully do not have a full set of BSW tools. :(
When I have some spare time I'll make a special set of tools for these threads. It seems like I have a lot of restoration work coming my way in the future.

The uncluttered outside of the Kyhl lock may have been easier to keep clean and if properly greased very little moisture should be able to get into the lock. I guess this would be beneficial on a musket made for the navy.
This particular musket is one of a kind but undoubtably an unmodified original piece made for the Norwegian navy. The badly pitted barrel bears the markings N=12 (nr. 12) and the numbers 791, maybe proceded by a 1, 1791?

This is how the lock looks on a 1807 model in better shape.
Studsarelas.JPG
 
Oppps, it was the screw on the jaws that had it's threads hand filed, not the frizzen screw.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top