which is the better of the two ? comments, advice, and reason why . any knowledge is held with great respect....thank y'all..
which barrel do you prefer to use and why?Ain't much of a smoothbore if it has rifling.
yes you are right, the go to all around hunt anything rifle would be smoothbore...Well, @hillbilly, the answer still depends on what you intend to use this firearm for. The choice can very well depend on the use.
A rifle is rifled to shoot single projectiles (roundballs). Shotgun pellets (buckshot) do not work well at all in a rifled barrel. Smoothbores have no rifling. They will shoot buckshot well, but will not shoot a projectile (ball) as well or with near the accuracy/distance as a rifle. If going for a smoothbore a 50 cal is small. 62 cal smoothbore is a 20 gauge. For all around hunting a smoothbore can be used as a shotgun for small game and turkey. You can shoot roundballs in a smoothbore out to about 50 yards with some accuracy. Beyond that you will need a rifle for good accuracy.yes you are right, the go to all around hunt anything rifle would be smoothbore...
.For all around hunting a smoothbore can be used as a shotgun for small game and turkey. You can shoot roundballs in a smoothbore out to about 50 yards with some accuracy. Beyond that you will need a rifle for good accuracy.
thank you ,with great respect,,Better is some sort of modern hunting rifle fitted with a good scope. Depending on your game and conditions as small as 5.5mm up to .50 nitro express.
Howsomever we choose to handicap ourselves with a short range messy single shot gun, and if used in hunting we have to get around its limitations. No popping an elk from three hundred yards away for us.
A ml rifle shooting a round ball is deadly at a hundred yards or a bit more and of large enough caliber may reliably take game at longer range. You may find some folk on this forum who have gotten twohundred yard kills with ball. Lots of practice and load development and right conditions. So let’s say for basic a rifle will serve as a hunter to a hundred yards.
A smooth bore is more limited. Again folks have done some work out to a hundred that with practice, load development and right conditions you can get. In general it’s a fifty yard gun.
Smoothbores do have a versatility in you can load shot and hunt bunny or Turkey and deer or elk in range the next day
I love my smoothies. And if I was going to have to survive in the woods it’s what I would grab, but it has more limitations then a rifle.
historicly from 1607- 1750 there were few rifles guns in America. After 1750 the numbers grew and America became a riflemans country. But during the ML era, right up to the 1860s smoothbores remained very popular where people hunted if not for a living at least for a valuable food source.
During the westren fur trade it was said Indians and Canadians would take a smoothbore while “Americans” reached for a rifle.
All are fun to shoot, all are historic and all are game getters if used correctly.
At this point I would insert a comment about real men shoot flint lock smooth bores, or fusil separate men from boys or some such and it would be just ribbing. Neither one has any advantage over the other except looking at one aspect. Rifles are accurate and longer ranged, smoothbores are versatile.
.All are fun to shoot, all are historic and all are game getters if used correctly.
At this point I would insert a comment about real men shoot flint lock smooth bores, or fusil separate men from ........... Neither one has any advantage over the other except looking at one aspect. Rifles are accurate and longer ranged, smoothbores are versatile.
Who said anything about useless? The original OP doesn’t seem to know the difference between a smoothbore and a rifle. I was trying to break it down in the simplest terms. I too hunt with a smoothbore but it’s not something a newbie should be led to believe he can shoot 2 inch groups with at 100 yards. Minute of deer or Buffalo yes. Target shooting no. The problem is the OP didn’t state what he wants to do with his gun other than all around hunting. Is that all around small game, all around big game or hunting anything from chipmunks to elephants. Might wanna grab the reading glasses and read my post again..
I hunted for 18-20 years with a NW Tradegun, have killed anything from mulies, elk to 2000 lb. buffalo, all with the useless smooth bore. "Useless my ass", first off it's about bullet (ball) placement on your animal. I've killed over a dozen buffalo in that many years for those with rifled gun that couldn't keep the animal on the ground because of just that - bullet (ball) placement. Agreed distance can change the game, the farthest I have personally taken a large animal is in the 80-85 yard range. At this distance we have been using lung shots having a larger area for placement. But like said it's about bullet (ball) placement.
.
which is the better of the two ? comments, advice, and reason why . any knowledge is held with great respect....thank y'all..
Welcome to the forum, hillbilly!sorry to all reading , let me fine tune this . I am doing an build and am not sure which barrel to go with.
the build is a .50cal flintlock. and looking for the knowledge of others in this skill for there choice and reason why
for a more all around use.
Enter your email address to join: