Here's one that should bring about some discussion. I'd be willing to bet that if not all of us, more than 99% use a short starter. Here's my question. How come, in all the books I've read and that show photos, and all the museums over thirty years, that show shooting pouchs with accouterments that have survived in tact all these years, how come there is never a short starter? Think about it, have you ever seen an original short starter? Powder measures, yes, vent picks, yes, patch knives, yes, patch material, yes, remains of lube, yes, worms and ball pullers, yes -- short starters, nope. Do you suppose they all used a loose enough fit to thumb start the ball? If they did that, wouldn't it require a lot lighter powder charge than what we will use a lot of times now days, especially hunting? I know in my 40 I can thumb start using 30 grains of powder and have good accuracy. In my .62 a thumb started ball never does worth a hoot, no matter how little powder I use. What do you think? How did they do it?