- Joined
- Feb 13, 2020
- Messages
- 3,105
- Reaction score
- 6,992
I should think a swamped flat would cut down on glare when sighting down the barrel. I would be interested in knowing the weight saving of a swamped barrel vs. non-swamped.
Last week in a thread about octagon to round barrel rifles one person said that it was totally unintentionally done because draw fiiling an true Octagon barrel was messed up and that's why we see swamped barrels
While Dave knows his barrels I think it only fair to add that Turkish rifled barrels where exellent & equal to the European makers .Nor do they vary much other than the tall rear sight arrangement and a tendency to swamp more heavily .And the beautiful figured' Damacus' barrels made long before Europeans could produce them I seem to recall Wm Rigby was the first to match them about 1818 or there abouts . They might have run around in Turbans & Baggy pants but they were no slouches in gun makeing .
Rudyard
I should think a swamped flat would cut down on glare when sighting down the barrel. I would be interested in knowing the weight saving of a swamped barrel vs. non-swamped.
I have my doubts about superior accuracy from swamped barrels as I have a very good friend who competes nationally at Friendship and has done very well there, tell me he rarely sees swamped barrels on the line or on the podeium at matches end.The swamped barrel is certainly not poor workmanship. The swamping was intentional. Making straight barrels from a flat skelp and forge welded is not a simple operation, in fact nearly impossible. The draw filing to smooth the weld and forging marks made may have increased the swamping effect or not, but the smith certainly wanted a smooth surfaced barrel.
Originally barrels were made from a flat skelp of soft iron that was forge welded around a mandrel. The welding started at about the middle of the barrel. As the soft iron was heated to welding temperature and forged around the barrel, the soft iron moved towards the breech or muzzle. As a result, the barrel was smaller in over diameter where the welding started and greater at the muzzle and breech. The smith used swaging blocks with several sizes of half octagon sections to accommodate the barrel as the size changed as the barrel was formed around the mandrel. The benefit of having more metal at the breech to contain the ignition pressures and a larger muzzle to raise the front sight were not lost on the gunsmith. Neither was the good handling characteristics of a swamped barrel lost to the smith.
Was swamping a barrel intentional? Yes, but it was also a function of the manufacturing process. That's one reason that the historical dimensions of the swamped barrels vary so much from gun builder to gun builder. Once the deep drilling process and large-scale mills that would produce straight sided barrels or tapered barrels, swamping of barrels from a barrel manufacturer faded away. There are very few swamped barrels made after about 1850.
I know a few duck hunters who have accidentally swamped a few barrels over the years.I’ve swamped a few barrels over the years, both round and octagon, and no one ever did it by accident.
You never asked me ! I hitched though Turkey in 66 Some rough sorts didn't get any Turkish delights got more Turkish fright''s in Kurdistan region particularly . But still like there old barrels .You never mentioned their Turkish Delight.......
Well its horses for courses the Line at F ship doesn't need swamped, the heavier strait Oct must be an advantage but no body carries them far . Then you get to the bench shooters No body would carry Them hunting .Not even the assassin's in tree stands .I have my doubts about superior accuracy from swamped barrels as I have a very good friend who competes nationally at Friendship and has done very well there, tell me he rarely sees swamped barrels on the line or on the podeium at matches end.
Exactly, the guys who go sheep hunting in the Rockies don't lug around the same rifles used at Camp Perry.Well its horses for courses the Line at F ship doesn't need swamped, the heavier strait Oct must be an advantage but no body carries them far . Then you get to the bench shooters No body would carry Them hunting .Not even the assassin's in tree stands .
Rudyard
Should read Turkish DelightSYou never mentioned their Turkish Delight.......
You never asked me ! I hitched though Turkey in 66 Some rough sorts didn't get any Turkish delights got more Turkish fright''s in Kurdistan region particularly . But still like there old barrels .
Regards Rudyard
Here in eastern Missouri at my traditional gun club, we have members who own and some who built rifles for the chunk gun, table matches, and plank matches common along the Mississippi River. All of them have straight barrels and heavy barrels. Apparently to reduce vibration. Since these rifles were built to make the smallest groups on targets, the straight barrel was the preferred choice.I have my doubts about superior accuracy from swamped barrels as I have a very good friend who competes nationally at Friendship and has done very well there, tell me he rarely sees swamped barrels on the line or on the podeium at matches end.
I know in reading about the guys who forge pure iron barrels on mandrels then rifle them on a 18th C. machine, the idea is to get dead harmonics, like you mentioned.Not according to Davy Crocket /Ed
Enter your email address to join: