Hello, i saw several online stores get 1861 springfields back in stock, labeled under traditions brand. Are they any good? Can someone who has owned or handled one in the past give me the rundown on them?
-
Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.
We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.
Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103
Traditions 1861 springfield?
- Thread starter ArbiterThel68
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
Traditions 1861's are made by Chiappa/Armisport. I've had an Armisport for years, they are a decent gun. It really depends on what you want one for, and what your expectations are. They aren't bad shooters when you develop a good load.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2013
- Messages
- 307
- Reaction score
- 210
'morning,
Agreeing with Trot, they're decent guns. No issues out of the box, and parts are available. One downside that I've noticed is that the half **** is usually very low (the hammer is barely above the cone). For range use, that's not an issue, but if you're using it as a reenactor weapon, that makes getting a cap on a bit slower than if you actually have room to access the cone.
Mike
Agreeing with Trot, they're decent guns. No issues out of the box, and parts are available. One downside that I've noticed is that the half **** is usually very low (the hammer is barely above the cone). For range use, that's not an issue, but if you're using it as a reenactor weapon, that makes getting a cap on a bit slower than if you actually have room to access the cone.
Mike
1General_Grant
40 Cal
You thinking of buying one? I got a Pedersoli 1861 Springfield I'd sell for $1100.
