Use of fine shot in colonial America

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Some northern tribes made a sieve by piercing birch bark, then pouring molten lead thru that into water. The result was some fairly decent small shot. Pretty simple yet ingenious device that saved the labor of cutting lead strips, although that was no doubt used as well.
 
Shot was used in the 18th century. The PDF :
Highways to History: The Archaeology of Connecticut’s
18th-Century Lifeways
There were excavations of several 18th century homesteads in Connecticut. This PDF has some great pics of artifacts. On page 67 of the PDF, it shows pics of round ball and two different types of shot that was found both round shot and cut shot.. On page 75 of the PDF, it talks about all the different sizes of shot that would have been used for hunting different game animals. The whole PDF is a really interesting read with all the stuff that was dug up on the different 18th century sites. Here is the link to the PDF:
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/dot/highwaystohistorypdf.pdf

Ohio Rusty ><>
 
Last edited:
According to Hamilton "Colonial Frontier Guns" 1987 the French in 1734 alone shipped 28,000 Livres (30,212 lbs) of shot to the French colonies.

One must assume the English were doing similar in the English colonies
 
I don’t think it was generally available and so was rarely used.
Safe bet that even most waterfowl was killed with rifles or smooth rifles or regular smoothbores loaded with a few buckshot/Rupert shot.
Small shot was absolutely widely available:
“At first, single shot was used for target-shooting and four-footed game; by the 1540s multiple shot was also used, at this date cut from lead sheet. By the end of his life Henry possessed 41 such “Haile Shotte peics”, clearly used for birds. These were obviously pretty deadly, as an Act of 1548 at-tempted to ban the “shoting of hayle-shot wherby an infinite sort of fowle is killed and much gaym therby distroyed” and lamented their uselessness to military training. These weapons, loaded with shot, can be regarded as the remote ancestors of the modern shotgun.” https://www.thefield.co.uk/shooting/history-shotgun-shooting-26590

“In 1686, Richard Blome’s “The Gentleman’s Recreation” became the first English publication portraying the shooting of flying birds. By the early 18th century, overhead shots were becoming a fairly common practice.

In 1776, the first recorded use of the term “shotgun” arose in a Kentucky publication called “Frontier Language of the West” by James Fenimore Cooper. This term separated the smoothbore shotgun from the rifled musket as advancements in technology greatly changed firearm barrel designs.” https://blog.gritrsports.com/the-history-of-the-shotgun/

Jay
 
I don’t think it was generally available and so was rarely used.
Safe bet that even most waterfowl was killed with rifles or smooth rifles or regular smoothbores loaded with a few buckshot/Rupert shot.
I should add that I was thinking out of habit more of what we would call #4 though #8 nicely uniformed shot. I knew about the square, Rupert, and swan shot.
 
I don’t think it was generally available and so was rarely used.
Safe bet that even most waterfowl was killed with rifles or smooth rifles or regular smoothbores loaded with a few buckshot/Rupert shot.
Shot and rifles don't work together well, and colonial rifles were a relatively small bore compared to militia muskets, so no, it's not a safe bet.
 
There's allot of game that can be taken without the use of a Shotgun or rifle..
Back then. If it mattered to conserve ammunition and time..
There hunting wasn't always all sporting like. That's all.

Just poachers. They were.
 
I have a collection of antique English sporting memorabilia and accessories related to wing-shooting. Among the items is a Bill of Laden that shows one of the line items "Shot 7 - 450 k" with the destination of New Boston, N. America. I always wondered if this was bags, a barrel or what. That's a heavy container if it's one. Anyway, someone was buying it in the U.S.A. There's no other detail, nor shotgunning related items on this Bill of Laden. I guess it's size 7 shot and 450 Kilograms? There are other items, like "Leaf 200 - Brn. 100" that I cannot figure out what it refers to. Then there's "Shaft 100, 160". That is assumed to be like shovel handles of English hardwood, 160 mm in length. "Cooper, She., Radc. Dist." is the addressee. I was told this was a distributor, or drygoods store Cooper, Sheath, Radcliffe Distributors. To store 450 kg of #7 shot for sale they had to have a location that would have buyers interested in it.
 
I have a collection of antique English sporting memorabilia and accessories related to wing-shooting. Among the items is a Bill of Laden that shows one of the line items "Shot 7 - 450 k" with the destination of New Boston, N. America. I always wondered if this was bags, a barrel or what. That's a heavy container if it's one. Anyway, someone was buying it in the U.S.A. There's no other detail, nor shotgunning related items on this Bill of Laden. I guess it's size 7 shot and 450 Kilograms? There are other items, like "Leaf 200 - Brn. 100" that I cannot figure out what it refers to. Then there's "Shaft 100, 160". That is assumed to be like shovel handles of English hardwood, 160 mm in length. "Cooper, She., Radc. Dist." is the addressee. I was told this was a distributor, or drygoods store Cooper, Sheath, Radcliffe Distributors. To store 450 kg of #7 shot for sale they had to have a location that would have buyers interested in it.
If the are using metric weights it is not that old. The English used pounds feet and miles. Today they still mix metric and English to some extant
 
Shot and rifles don't work together well, and colonial rifles were a relatively small bore compared to militia muskets, so no, it's not a safe bet.
What I meant was that a lot of waterfowl were killed with rifles firing single bullets.
I know it works because I have done it myself years ago.
In the old days there were no game laws and no one carrying a rifle would have passed up a shot at a duck or a goose just because they didn’t have a smoothbore of some sort loaded with small shot.
 
What I meant was that a lot of waterfowl were killed with rifles firing single bullets.
I know it works because I have done it myself years ago.
In the old days there were no game laws and no one carrying a rifle would have passed up a shot at a duck or a goose just because they didn’t have a smoothbore of some sort loaded with small shot.
Wild Sports in the Far West by Friedrich Gerstacker, lots of references to shooting wildfowl with a rifle.

Different sensibility toward shooting sitting game back then.
 
Wild Sports in the Far West by Friedrich Gerstacker, lots of references to shooting wildfowl with a rifle.

Different sensibility toward shooting sitting game back then.
True. But when you get down to it, what is the difference between shooting a hopping squirrel, standing deer, etc., and shooting a duck swimming on a pond?
 
I have a collection of antique English sporting memorabilia and accessories related to wing-shooting. Among the items is a Bill of Laden that shows one of the line items "Shot 7 - 450 k" with the destination of New Boston, N. America. I always wondered if this was bags, a barrel or what. That's a heavy container if it's one. Anyway, someone was buying it in the U.S.A. There's no other detail, nor shotgunning related items on this Bill of Laden. I guess it's size 7 shot and 450 Kilograms? There are other items, like "Leaf 200 - Brn. 100" that I cannot figure out what it refers to. Then there's "Shaft 100, 160". That is assumed to be like shovel handles of English hardwood, 160 mm in length. "Cooper, She., Radc. Dist." is the addressee. I was told this was a distributor, or drygoods store Cooper, Sheath, Radcliffe Distributors. To store 450 kg of #7 shot for sale they had to have a location that would have buyers interested in it.
That would be “Bill of Lading”
 
This would be a good place to start your research on the subject.

https://www.minnesotatrap.com/history-in-the-making/shot-towers-page-1.htm
1732894367385.png
 
Back
Top