Wizards of the forum:
I bought a used 1858 Remington cylinder. I was told that it was an Uberti. Am I going nuts or it doesn't quite seem to fit.
How do I know for sure if it is an Uberti?
Things that make me suspicious:
* The new cylinder has a proof mark and the one that came with the gun does not.
* The new cylinder doesn't cock when you get it in.
* The new cylinder is very difficult to get back out
* I could swear the threads on the nipples are different. Not very different, but they don't line up between the cylinders.
* The bluing is somehow a different tint.(Subjective)
* I could swear the two cylinders are a different size. Not by much, but I can feel a difference.(No micrometer to measure it with on hand.)
The proof mark that is on the new cylinder closely resembles the proof mark on the gun. A shield, P N and a star in like a circular sunburst. It looks like the ones on[url] http://gunaccessory.com/Proof_Marks/proofmarks.htm[/url]
OK, that's enough to make me suspicious but before I say that it's definitely wrong I would prefer to get a way of double checking or identifying the source of this mystery cylinder. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I bought a used 1858 Remington cylinder. I was told that it was an Uberti. Am I going nuts or it doesn't quite seem to fit.
How do I know for sure if it is an Uberti?
Things that make me suspicious:
* The new cylinder has a proof mark and the one that came with the gun does not.
* The new cylinder doesn't cock when you get it in.
* The new cylinder is very difficult to get back out
* I could swear the threads on the nipples are different. Not very different, but they don't line up between the cylinders.
* The bluing is somehow a different tint.(Subjective)
* I could swear the two cylinders are a different size. Not by much, but I can feel a difference.(No micrometer to measure it with on hand.)
The proof mark that is on the new cylinder closely resembles the proof mark on the gun. A shield, P N and a star in like a circular sunburst. It looks like the ones on[url] http://gunaccessory.com/Proof_Marks/proofmarks.htm[/url]
OK, that's enough to make me suspicious but before I say that it's definitely wrong I would prefer to get a way of double checking or identifying the source of this mystery cylinder. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Last edited by a moderator: