I got several of both. The Uberti's usually look better, but my Pietta's shoot better. These are generalizations, and the differences in accuracy are slight enough to be negligible, as is the difference between more recent Pietta's fit and finish vs. the Uberti, which in times past was clearly superior. My favorite revolver is a stock Pietta 1851 Navy, it has had 10,000+ balls thru it. I shoot clay pigeons at 50 yards with it, and a metal plate 6"×8", at 100 yards. I don't hit everytime, but when I miss, it isn't the guns fault. You WILL have to replace springs and such, Uberti or Pietta, if you shoot it a lot. I keep a bunch of those little doo-dads on hand, realizing that current Italian metallurgy is probably not quite the equal of mid 19th century quality. My Uberti's use a .380 ball, while the Pietta's are fine with either .375 or .380. Never have shot conicals, but just from observation it seems the Uberti would be the better choice, as it seems better manufactured from the factory with a larger opening with which to get the bullet under the rammer.