Sorry if this has been discussed before (I have been on vacation for 6 months)...
I have been wondering ever since the discussion on the "best" fusil de chasse why it is that many of the modern fusil locks are not exact replicas of the originals, particularly as regards the size of the lockplate?
Is there some production related problem -say a limit to the size the investment castings can be made?
Or is it maybe a case of trying to market a lock that can be used on rifles as well as fusils?
I realise no two fusil locks were alike (apart from the experimental interchangeable locks briefly made at Tulle), but why make a replica thats not really a replica?
thanks
I have been wondering ever since the discussion on the "best" fusil de chasse why it is that many of the modern fusil locks are not exact replicas of the originals, particularly as regards the size of the lockplate?
Is there some production related problem -say a limit to the size the investment castings can be made?
Or is it maybe a case of trying to market a lock that can be used on rifles as well as fusils?
I realise no two fusil locks were alike (apart from the experimental interchangeable locks briefly made at Tulle), but why make a replica thats not really a replica?
thanks