leam
36 Cal.
Besides potential pressures as you near the breech, is there any reason to have the rear site as forward as seems to be normal?
leam said:Not sure I see modern rifles with the sights that far forward. Enfield, M1A, M16, etc. Sights at or behind the chamber. I do like the idea of "balance point" and protecting it. Not sure that's the reason, but it sure sounds good!
---------------------------------------------M.D. said:That's the truth spoken with good humor!
It's also the reason I have always preferred aperture (peep) sights on the tang with the front blade.
They are more accurate than open at any range and make aging eye have one less focal plane to adjust for.
smoothshooter said:If you haven't done so already, get a pair of " transition " bifocal lens glasses.
By slight movements of your head, you can fine tune to the sweet spot where you get a very useable sight picture with open sights.
You will have better luck with them if you have the people who make the lenses to put the center area of the transition area about 30 to 40 percent higher than they do for most people.
I have far-sightedness and astigmatism, and I am able to do pretty well out to several hundred yards with open sights with guns that are accurate that far.
I know some vision problems are not fixable to 20/20, but I am astounded at the number of people whose vision, near and far deteriorates to the point that they have to give up doing things they need to or want to do because they will not get glasses, or if they already wear them, will not stay after the optometrist ( or whatever ) about adjustments until they get an arrangement that works as good as possible. I probably know at least ten people who fit in that category.
ol vern said:So us old farts can see them. :rotf: :rotf:
Enter your email address to join: