I had a sit-up-in-bed thought recently. Why make a smooth rifle with an octagonal barrel? The barrels of smooth rifles are fairly thick walled; enough to support rifling. Isn't this a waste of iron and an added complication in the bedding process, as well as a bunch of unnecessary weight?
I guess if a skelp is formed around a mandrel it is easier to hammer out an eight sided shape as opposed to a cylinder, but I'm no blacksmith. Is a octagonal barrel perhaps easier to inlet into a stock, or no different from a cylinder? Muskets were all round barrels at that time, so presumably it was a standard practice to shape a tapered cylindrical barrel. Certainly a thinner wall would have been practical? Was the metal quality low enough to require wall thicknesses 50% of the bore diameter
There is an ongoing argument that smooth rifles were possibly rifles that were shot out and/or opened out purposely to extend their life.
I got no answer here, it just struck me and I thought it worth a discussion.
I guess if a skelp is formed around a mandrel it is easier to hammer out an eight sided shape as opposed to a cylinder, but I'm no blacksmith. Is a octagonal barrel perhaps easier to inlet into a stock, or no different from a cylinder? Muskets were all round barrels at that time, so presumably it was a standard practice to shape a tapered cylindrical barrel. Certainly a thinner wall would have been practical? Was the metal quality low enough to require wall thicknesses 50% of the bore diameter
There is an ongoing argument that smooth rifles were possibly rifles that were shot out and/or opened out purposely to extend their life.
I got no answer here, it just struck me and I thought it worth a discussion.