The hardest rifle to find a replacement for will be the one you leave on the table.
Last edited:
Sorry for the late reply, my smoothbore 16ga fowler has a 37 9/16" barrel, the lock is a Davis and the barrel is round all the way with a front sight and removable rear that flips up to 100 yards ( I don't think I can hit anything at that range). It handles well and I don't know it's exact weight but I assume its in the ballpark of 9 or 10 pounds. I have been trying my best to get good at range but I can't hit the broadside of a barn. I bought my smoothbore incase I couldn't find a rifle in time I could legally take deer. Is .62 really that rare in a rifle ? I figured it would be common like .58 cal.I see a lot more .50's for sale here than .62's.
You don't mention the length of your smoothbore.
I prefer long barrels, but if the smoothbore is long, then the shorter .62 would seem to be the best choice.
If your smoothbore is not so long, then it's more of a decision between a long barrel or a rarer, shorter rifle.
Either way, I think you win!
Does the smaller ball achieve better velocity than a larger ball ? I know you said that the barrel lengths don't matter but do the smaller calibers achieve better velocity than the larger ones?The 62 caliber rifle will be quite similar in performance to your fusil. The fowling gun with its front and rear sights should be accurate enough for your hunting requirements with a bit of practice and load development.
The 50 caliber seems to be the rifle to get to expand your flintlock experience.
Look into grief counseling to address the sense of loss about the other rifle.
I see your point then about the .62 having the same performance to my fowler. If I buy a rifle I might as well get a rifle that can reach out farther and more accurately than my fowler can. Thank you for all your help.Yes, the smaller ball will have higher velocity.
The .62 rifle will still be more "accurate" than your .62 smoothbore.I see your point then about the .62 having the same performance to my fowler. If I buy a rifle I might as well get a rifle that can reach out farther and more accurately than my fowler can. Thank you for all your help.
You have to have riflings to be a rifle? Smooth bores are just shotguns? Tongue in cheek! LOL!They are both rifles
The fusil (fowling gun) does have front and rear sights. Yes, the 62 caliber rifled gun will be more accurate on target than the fusil. The 16 gauge fusil should use a different sized ball than the 62 caliber rifle. Why give up the longer range inherent in the 50 caliber rifle?Sorry for the late reply, my smoothbore 16ga fowler has a 37 9/16" barrel, the lock is a Davis and the barrel is round all the way with a front sight and removable rear that flips up to 100 yards ( I don't think I can hit anything at that range). It handles well and I don't know it's exact weight but I assume its in the ballpark of 9 or 10 pounds. I have been trying my best to get good at range but I can't hit the broadside of a barn. I bought my smoothbore incase I couldn't find a rifle in time I could legally take deer. Is .62 really that rare in a rifle ? I figured it would be common like .58 cal.
MURPHY, I dont mean to but in but I am about 30 miles from Keyser in WV and looking for a flintlock. After you buy if you dont mind you can give the seller my number and I would be interested in the other if price is reasonable. Pm me if you would be interested in doing this,,Recently I posted on the forum about pointers to get into Muzzleloading. I purchased a smoothbore flintlock 16ga fowler which I have apart right and is being throughly cleaned. However there is a seller in Piedmont,WV who is selling two rifles for a decent price which have perked my interest. I was able to get my 16ga for such a good price it left me with enough to also get a rifle. The two rifles are a .50 caliber 45 7/8" barrel and a .62 caliber 36 3/4" barrel. They are both beautiful and have been well taken care of. Both rifles are in my price limit and I can only buy one. My question is which rifle will be harder to find. If I buy one I want to buy the rifle I most likely will never find again. I really like both of them and he has another buyer who will buy whatever I don't. My buddies on my crew are split on what I should buy when I asked so I figured I would come back here for some more expert advice. Sorry if my posts are too consistent and annoying. I thank everyone who replies.
Edit: I have made aware that my descriptions are very vague (my apologies).
Both flintlocks are Rifles, rifling looks good in both and they are both very clean. I ran oversize patches down both bores and there was no snagging of the fabric. Both rifles are equal in terms of looks and fitting of parts (brass and barrel as well as the lock all fit well with the wood). The barrels and locks both have good bluing. The locks are different though, the .50 caliber rifle has a Siler lock and the .62 caliber rifle has an L&R lock. Both frizzens show signs of use nothing damaging though as both rifles have been used since the early 1980s. I do not know who was the manufacturer of either barrel or where the stocks came from. I don't have any pictures as the owner asked me not to share any of his rifles online until he is no longer the owner of them ( so I didn't take any pictures ). My apologies for all the confusion, I will remember to post better descriptions in the future.
Recently I posted on the forum about pointers to get into Muzzleloading. I purchased a smoothbore flintlock 16ga fowler which I have apart right and is being throughly cleaned. However there is a seller in Piedmont,WV who is selling two rifles for a decent price which have perked my interest. I was able to get my 16ga for such a good price it left me with enough to also get a rifle. The two rifles are a .50 caliber 45 7/8" barrel and a .62 caliber 36 3/4" barrel. They are both beautiful and have been well taken care of. Both rifles are in my price limit and I can only buy one. My question is which rifle will be harder to find. If I buy one I want to buy the rifle I most likely will never find again. I really like both of them and he has another buyer who will buy whatever I don't. My buddies on my crew are split on what I should buy when I asked so I figured I would come back here for some more expert advice. Sorry if my posts are too consistent and annoying. I thank everyone who replies.
Edit: I have made aware that my descriptions are very vague (my apologies).
Both flintlocks are Rifles, rifling looks good in both and they are both very clean. I ran oversize patches down both bores and there was no snagging of the fabric. Both rifles are equal in terms of looks and fitting of parts (brass and barrel as well as the lock all fit well with the wood). The barrels and locks both have good bluing. The locks are different though, the .50 caliber rifle has a Siler lock and the .62 caliber rifle has an L&R lock. Both frizzens show signs of use nothing damaging though as both rifles have been used since the early 1980s. I do not know who was the manufacturer of either barrel or where the stocks came from. I don't have any pictures as the owner asked me not to share any of his rifles online until he is no longer the owner of them ( so I didn't take any pictures ). My apologies for all the confusion, I will remember to post better descriptions in the future.
The two rifles are a .50 caliber 45 7/8" barrel and a .62 caliber 36 3/4" barrel. They are both beautiful and have been well taken care of. Both rifles are in my price limit and I can only buy one. My question is which rifle will be harder to find.
Enter your email address to join: