• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Testing .44 Caliber Stepped Chambers

L & R
the hawken shop
shop deals on amazon
Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
nkbj

nkbj

Cannon
MLF Supporter
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
13,017
Reaction score
7,265
These are from the old standard Lee #45-228-1R round nose mold that looks much the same as those that Lee produces for percussion revolvers. Cast from soft lead they weigh around 237-238 grains, get lard/beeswax/lanolin lube and are pushed through a .451" sizer. Those shown below were recovered from a stacked paper backstop.
20 25 30 Lee 45 228.jpg

The 1858 is a Pietta that's had the chambers reamed and trued up to .450" diameter and then reamed .452" diameter to 3/8" depth. The .451" diameter bullets slip into the .452" portion for primary alignment during seating and are then seated down onto the powder, their bases passing through the beveled step-down of the .450" portion on the way.
The base ring shows the rifling grooves were filled. No signs of gas cutting.
 
cynthialee said:
wow
That'll put a hurt on ya won't it...
Click to expand...
Good morning cynthialee.
In fifty years of tinkering with percussion revolvers, well, this might be the way I do things from now on. Still have plenty of testing to go yet with the molds on hand. The frame on this Pietta 1858 just barely lets the bullets align to go into the chambers. I could do surgery on it but haven't so far. There's probably some molds that have a base to shoulder length too long to let the bullet get started into the chambers. And as another matter, .45 molds that run heavy any way, like around 250 grains with hard alloy, they're going to be really heavy with straight lead. I suppose like with everything in life it'll all be a matter of trade-offs.
 
nkbj said:
These are from the old standard Lee #45-228-1R round nose mold that looks much the same as those that Lee produces for percussion revolvers. Cast from soft lead they weigh around 237-238 grains, get lard/beeswax/lanolin lube and are pushed through a .451" sizer. Those shown below were recovered from a stacked paper backstop.
View attachment 345517
The 1858 is a Pietta that's had the chambers reamed and trued up to .450" diameter and then reamed .452" diameter to 3/8" depth. The .451" diameter bullets slip into the .452" portion for primary alignment during seating and are then seated down onto the powder, their bases passing through the beveled step-down of the .450" portion on the way.
The base ring shows the rifling grooves were filled. No signs of gas cutting.
Click to expand...
I still don't understand the thinking of making the chamber mouths a smaller diameter than is the barrel groove diameter in these percussion guns and wonder if it was an original Colt spec or Italian idea.
From what I can tell both ball or conical respond favorably when they are more closely matched.
Other modifications from original design such as straight twist in place of gain twist and apparently shortened arbors have also been made.
 
Last edited:
Undersized chambers? Makes me remember what Robert Heinlein once wrote about, the weekend of shame for Americans when they rose up en masse and slaughtered all the lawyers.

For these tests I'll be using a variety of other designs of molds and hopefully both FFg and FFFFg and Triple Seven. Have had bad experiences with citric acid oxidizer powder so won't bother with others.
 
Last edited:
An unexpected bright spot with the elevation...
In the workups with the 237 grain round nose it's dead on at 12 paces with a filled chamber, the 27 grains of FFFg under the bullet. I'd anticipated it being higher with the longer recoil.
But the side pull on the windage definitely says I need to practice more.
 
nkbj said:
An unexpected bright spot with the elevation...
In the workups with the 237 grain round nose it's dead on at 12 paces with a filled chamber, the 27 grains of FFFg under the bullet. I'd anticipated it being higher with the longer recoil.
But the side pull on the windage definitely says I need to practice more.
Click to expand...
I’ll bet it’s close to spot on at 50 yards too… also, on several revolvers now I’ve turned a flat inside of the ram so all soft lead or even 30:1 alloy projectiles have a flat meplat after ramming home.
 
Yeah, been kinda wondering about some bullets' nose designs. With the alignment reaming on these chambers maybe the factory dished face is as good as it gets. Or maybe it could just be filled in level with JB Weld.
 
AlexB said:
They don't back out under recoil and jam the cylinder?
Click to expand...
Not so far. The .452" diameter portion of the chambers is 3/8" deep. That depth was chosen as midrange guesstitmate after measuring various .45 pistol and revolvers molds. The engagement between the bullets and the .450" portion of the chambers has been sufficient with maxed out charges to hold those 237 grain round nosed bullets in place. I'd expect that sooner or later I'll try one that doesn't work, a bullet design sized to .451" and powder charge that lets the bullet slip forwards.
So far it looks as though it's a good thing that I didn't go with a bigger difference in diameters. When seating the bullets into that little bit of neck down you can feel a good bit of resistance.
There's some conical nosed bullets made up and ready to go that are longer than the round noses though they're actually a little lighter in weight. Going to be a point of interest to see how much resistance they provide and what their smooshed noses look like after being seated. There's some .454 or .457 round ball around here too that I need to hunt up.
 
nkbj said:
Not so far. The .452" diameter portion of the chambers is 3/8" deep. That depth was chosen as midrange guesstitmate after measuring various .45 pistol and revolvers molds. The engagement between the bullets and the .450" portion of the chambers has been sufficient with maxed out charges to hold those 237 grain round nosed bullets in place. I'd expect that sooner or later I'll try one that doesn't work, a bullet design sized to .451" and powder charge that lets the bullet slip forwards.
So far it looks as though it's a good thing that I didn't go with a bigger difference in diameters. When seating the bullets into that little bit of neck down you can feel a good bit of resistance.
There's some conical nosed bullets made up and ready to go that are longer than the round noses though they're actually a little lighter in weight. Going to be a point of interest to see how much resistance they provide and what their smooshed noses look like after being seated. There's some .454 or .457 round ball around here too that I need to hunt up.
Click to expand...
I've been using these 210 grain ACP bullets in my Walker sized and lubed with good initial results. My chambers have some taper in them that have been keeping these antimony alloyed bullets in place under the full charge loads of 3F powder recoil. The BHN is 12 on these bullets and the nose corner radius is barely deformed from the hemisphere ram face after seating.
I was considering reaming but am going to do some more accuracy testing before getting the reamer out with both ball and different conicals.
The heeled design seems a plus for loading ease, gas seal and base seating square/ alignment.
I'm starting to think that Uberti may have a better mouse trap with the tapered chambers in place of stepping. They're sure easy to keep clean of fouling residue.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2473.JPG
    IMG_2473.JPG
    293.5 KB
  • IMG_2475.JPG
    IMG_2475.JPG
    236.4 KB
  • IMG_2479.JPG
    IMG_2479.JPG
    3.8 MB
  • IMG_2485.JPG
    IMG_2485.JPG
    3.2 MB
Last edited:
Wow, that's a close fit but it works.
In the Walker I used the RCBS #45-225-CAV design that looks like a shorty maxiball but the rear band has to be sized to slip into the chambers.
 

Similar threads

C
snake load test fire
Replies
16
Views
2K
George Tucker
G
M
  • Locked
Glossary of Muzzleloading Terms
Replies
0
Views
3K
musketman
M
G
So you want a cap and ball revolver?
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
RHG
RHG
P
Keith article on cap and ball pistols-long
Replies
9
Views
4K
WV_Hillbilly
W

Latest posts

Back
Top