• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Access Heritage Baker rifle cleaning rod modification

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ArmorerRoy

40 Cal
Joined
May 8, 2017
Messages
420
Reaction score
1,535
Location
Las Vegas
Their Baker rifle comes with an incorrect cleaning rod that has a large hump making the rod too thick and heavy. Also the end of the rod is incorrect as being too thick. I belt sanded the hump out of the rod thinning it out to achieve a more accurate look (based on the original rod). After removing the hump I found that the pipes were too large on the inside. A brass 308 case fit perfectly inside so I cut off the base and about 1/2 inch from the front of the case. I glued the brass case inside the pipe with JB Weld. Now everything fits as intended and does not change the look of the gun. The rod is no longer too thick or heavy.

Original rod
IMG_0919.jpeg

Modified rod
IMG_1581.jpeg

IMG_1582.jpeg

Modified pipe
IMG_1583.jpeg

Full rifle
IMG_1584.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Hi,
That swell in the rod was designed to fill the forward ramrod pipe so the rod did not rattle loosely in the pipe. You can see the proper shapes in Bailey's book "British Military Flintlock Rifles" on page 113. By the looks of your gun, it is supposed to be a pattern 1805 or later. Consequently, the ramrod shown on page 113 labeled "c" is the correct one.

dave
 
Interesting. I don’t have that book. All the pics I could find showed a thinner rod. Maybe I did a bad thing but I do like the modification better.
 
Back
Top