Help with Hawken Identification.

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I have a new old stock sharon barrel and your breech looks just like mine. From the few others I've seen the stamping can be fairly shallow and fine. My crown is different from yours and the one pictured above, but that doesn't mean much, rifling looks the same.
On a side note i did once find a douglas barrel stamp under the barrel rib, just a suggestion if ypu can't find it with the chalk trick.
20241101_132656.jpg
20241101_132808.jpg
20241101_132919.jpg
 
I have a new old stock sharon barrel and your breech looks just like mine. From the few others I've seen the stamping can be fairly shallow and fine. My crown is different from yours and the one pictured above, but that doesn't mean much, rifling looks the same.
On a side note i did once find a douglas barrel stamp under the barrel rib, just a suggestion if ypu can't find it with the chalk trick.View attachment 359429View attachment 359430View attachment 359431
Under the barrel rib is another location i haven't checked as I haven't yet gotten the screws to loosen and don't want to strip them. When I'm able to free it I'll look under there too.

The snail on the breech does look very similar, but it also looks like your breech plug is larger than barrel where mine is flush. What caliber is yours?
 
Under the barrel rib is another location i haven't checked as I haven't yet gotten the screws to loosen and don't want to strip them. When I'm able to free it I'll look under there too.

The snail on the breech does look very similar, but it also looks like your breech plug is larger than barrel where mine is flush. What caliber is yours?
It is slightly oversized in spots, looks like it wasn't draw filled properly. Its also a different color, like if the bluing didn't take to the plug the same as the barrel. Me and my dad both bought one from a trader roughly 20 years ago and they were both identical. No telling where they actually came from. Mine was unfortunately stolen. It's a 58 by the way.
 
Looks a lot like my Sharon hawken. The entry pipe is one distinguishing feature. The barrel marking on mine is both faint and half under one of the barrel tennons. My lock is unmarked. May not be able to say for certain, but a nice gun regardless of maker.
So I've finally had a moment to get the lock off. It is marked L&R on the inner lock plate. Don't know that it's much to go off of as there seem to be a number of places online where you purchase L&R locks.

I'm also curious about the rear buckhorn sight. In all my research I've yet to come across a rear sight which looks quite like it.

There is also no markings on the stock underneath the lock plate.
 

Attachments

  • 20241104_165527.jpg
    20241104_165527.jpg
    1.2 MB
  • 20241104_165558.jpg
    20241104_165558.jpg
    1.5 MB
  • 20241104_165712.jpg
    20241104_165712.jpg
    5.3 MB
  • 20241104_165730.jpg
    20241104_165730.jpg
    2.9 MB
I seem to recall early Sharon kits used LR locks and triggers.

I generally think a gun that shoots well, works well and you're happy with the way it looks and handles, who made it isn't so important. Good to know, but a good functioning tool from even an unknown maker has value. I think here it's likely a Sharon gun, but maybe cannot say for certain what it is.
 
I seem to recall early Sharon kits used LR locks and triggers.

I generally think a gun that shoots well, works well and you're happy with the way it looks and handles, who made it isn't so important. Good to know, but a good functioning tool from even an unknown maker has value. I think here it's likely a Sharon gun, but maybe cannot say for certain what it is.
Agreed. I've only had it once and am still working on dialing in the accuracy, but im very pleased with it. I intend on using it to hunt elk up here and I think she'll do just fine for that. For the price I paid I don't think I could have gotten a better deal.
 
Back
Top