• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Bend the sear bar up?

the hawken shop
Shop deals on ebay
Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
W

WonkyEye

.50 T/C Hawken
MLF Supporter
Joined
Feb 10, 2024
Messages
174
Reaction score
188
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Update: got a very fast reply from Jim Chambers. His suggestion is grinding the bottom of the sear lever and noted its 2x as thick as necessary. He also said bending was ok and gave instructions to re-heat treat. Give that advice, and the large number of suggestions to grind, that is what I'll do.



This is my first build. Chambers Dale Johnson lock. The sear bar is so close to the edge of the lock plate 15/1000s, that I'm concerned. After polishing the edge of the plate it might even be even with the edge.

I'm thinking about bending it up 1/32" so it's not touching the wood. My hesitation is this lock works like a fine tuned clock, compared to my TC and my L&R it's a thing of mechanical beauty. I'd hate to cause a bigger problem.

I haven't inlet anything yet, I'm still working out layout and measurements. I'm taking my time and waiting for winter hibernation to really get going.

If I do bend, what's your tips for re-hardening and tempering the sear?
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20241119_153607352.jpg
    PXL_20241119_153607352.jpg
    1.8 MB
  • PXL_20241119_153534665.jpg
    PXL_20241119_153534665.jpg
    1.9 MB
Last edited:
If you do bend the sear bar you don't need to reharden it. The only reason that the whole sear is harden is because of the way they are manufactured. When made the whole sear is harden and tempered because it is easier to do it that way then to just harden only the nose of the sear. There is ample amount of steel in the sear bar that it will not deform from the action of the trigger and if you think you will wear the sear or trigger bar think again - it would take MANY years for that to happen. The only thing that you MAY notice is a rough trigger pull but not much if at all. That trigger bar is still hardened. There is not much movement between the sear and trigger bar so very little wear is between the two surfaces.

I've done a lot of "tweaking" on sear bars to give me more clearance (Clarence :)). Do as Phil says to check if the sear drops below the plate when in full **** position if so call Jim Chambers.
 
WonkyEye said:
This is my first build. Chambers Dale Johnson lock. The sear bar is so close to the edge of the lock plate 15/1000s, that I'm concerned. After polishing the edge of the plate it might even be even with the edge.

I'm thinking about bending it up 1/32" so it's not touching the wood. My hesitation is this lock works like a fine tuned clock, compared to my TC and my L&R it's a thing of mechanical beauty. I'd hate to cause a bigger problem.

I haven't inlet anything yet, I'm still working out layout and measurements. I'm taking my time and waiting for winter hibernation to really get going.

If I do bend, what's your tips for re-hardening and tempering the sear?
Click to expand...

Why would you bend it? Its where it is designed to be on the plate, the trigger contact is close, bending the sear will put it further away
 
FlinterNick said:
Why would you bend it? Its where it is designed to be on the plate, the trigger contact is close, bending the sear will put it further away
Click to expand...
For the sake of discussion and not argumentative. A sear below the plate causes issues when replacing and removing the lock.
What difference does it make if the sear is farther away from the trigger contact? A trigger bar has to fit the situation. (add or shorten hight of the bar) More thought please.
Larry
 
Larry (Omaha) said:
For the sake of discussion and not argumentative. A sear below the plate causes issues when replacing and removing the lock.
What difference does it make if the sear is farther away from the trigger contact? A trigger bar has to fit the situation. (add or shorten hight of the bar) More thought please.
Larry
Click to expand...

Regards to the sear being further … you’ll have a dangling trigger. When I build I try to fit the trigger so contact is close almost self setting
 
Silers(the Dale Johnson lock is a modified Siler) are made that way. You won't file anything off that hard metal, but since there is plenty of metal, a little judicious grinding will help you clearance.
For a bit of background. Dale took a Siler lock and sawed the plate almost in half. Then he bent the tail down about 1/8" to allow the tail to follow the wrist better, and welded the plate together. This along with undercutting the breechplug lug helps avoid the infamous humpbacked wrist. Jim then took the modified lock and used it to make the mold masters for casting.
 
Last edited:
Larry (Omaha) said:
For the sake of discussion and not argumentative. A sear below the plate causes issues when replacing and removing the lock.
What difference does it make if the sear is farther away from the trigger contact? A trigger bar has to fit the situation. (add or shorten hight of the bar) More thought please.
Larry
Click to expand...
How is the sear at half ****? You might have no issue removing and replacing the lock that position.
 
EC121 said:
Silers(the Dale Johnson lock is a modified Siler) are made that way. You won't file anything off that hard metal, but since there is plenty of metal, a little judicious grinding will help you clearance.
For a bit of background. Dale took a Siler lock and sawed the plate almost in half. Then he bent the tail down about 1/8" to allow the tail to follow the wrist better, and welded the plate together. This along with undercutting the breechplug lug helps avoid the infamous humpbacked wrist. Jim then took the modified lock and used it to make the mold masters for casting.
Click to expand...
Agree. A bit of grinding will give you the clearance you’re looking for.
 
It is where it was designed to be Don't mess with it. Jim designed this one so that the sear bar will be in the same place regardless of where the hammer is. Even the new Siler's use this type of tumbler and sear so you no longer have to worry about the sear bar dropping below the edge of the plate.
 
Tumbledown said:
How is the sear at half ****? You might have no issue removing and replacing the lock that position.
Click to expand...
Good call. Half **** gets me a bit of extra clearance, 15/1000" uncocked, 25/1000" half cocked, 35/1000" full ****. That makes me feel better. My concern was wet wood swells, and might mean full **** doesn't catch because of contact with the wood or worse, just barely and shaking or bumping is enough to set it off.

Combining all of the above advice this far:
1. I did email Chambers the pics and ask for thoughts. I'm assuming I've just offended Mr. Chambers, or annoyed him because it's probably meant to be like that. If I get a response I'll follow their advice.
2. Combining several suggestions above, the sear bar is 1/16" thick, I could probably remove half of it and still have plenty of strength, but I think 1/64" is plenty. If I need more I'll undercut the mortise and make a notch for clearance.


Regarding sloppy triggers, my triggers have way too much metal, I will be grinding away a lot of it, if I don't the wrist will be thick, about 1.75" where the tang bolt goes through to the lock plate. The original JP Beck I'm trying to loosely follow is 1.625" in that dimension. Grinding a 1/32 of the sear bar gets me 1/4 of the way there.
 
WonkyEye said:
Half **** gets me a bit of extra clearance, 15/1000" uncocked, 25/1000" half cocked, 35/1000" full ****. That makes me feel better. My concern was wet wood swells, and might mean full **** doesn't catch because of contact with the wood or worse, just barely and shaking or bumping is enough to set it off.
Click to expand...
I would suggest NOT bending sear bar, only potentially creating a real problem. As long as sear is inside the lockplate you are good to go, just remove enough wood inside the mortise to allow clearance at all sear bar positions.

Worried about the wood swelling from moisture, apply a sealer to the wood. If you insist on doing something, maybe stone a few thousandths off the bottom of the sear bar, but still have to ask why.

Here is a RE Davis lock, maybe .025” clearance at full ****. Doesn’t touch the wood in the mortise, as the wood has been carefully cleared out.
1732075784276.jpeg
 
SDSmlf said:
I would suggest NOT bending sear bar, only potentially creating a real problem. As long as sear is inside the lockplate you are good to go, just remove enough wood inside the mortise to allow clearance at all sear bar positions.

Worried about the wood swelling from moisture, apply a sealer to the wood. If you insist on doing something, maybe stone a few thousandths off the bottom of the sear bar, but still have to ask why.

Here is a RE Davis lock, maybe .025” clearance at full ****. Doesn’t touch the wood in the mortise, as the wood has been carefully cleared out.
View attachment 363211
Click to expand...
You're sort of making my point, that's huge compared to what I have. if I had that much space I wouldn't have made this post.
 

Similar threads

E
Homemade Siler replacement lock.
Replies
5
Views
409
EC121
E
J
Trigger Sear Arm Height
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Joemolf
J
W
And it begins...
Replies
6
Views
767
Kevin Houlihan
K
W
I have such a long way to go
Replies
0
Views
448
WonkyEye
W
H
Bent lock plate
Replies
8
Views
876
HighUintas
H

Latest posts

Back
Top