• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

1842 Springfield 69cal question

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Booneman

32 Cal
Joined
Nov 11, 2024
Messages
7
Reaction score
5
Location
Pittsburgh
I recently got this 1842 Springfield and I wanted to know if why there is a brass piece on the lock?
Did someone convert this to flintlock then back to cap lock?
Any help would be great!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5742.jpeg
    IMG_5742.jpeg
    2.9 MB
Don't know what you have there, but it is not an 1842 Springfield. They had a MUCH different percussion snail and it was not a nipple set directly in the barrel. The cock/hammer does not look original and the lock really doesn't, either. The lockplate bolt holes are also wrong. You have a cobbled up Frankenstein, I'm afraid.

I'm pretty sure it is an 1840 flintlock Springfield reworked into a percussion. But I don't know if this was an "arsenal job" or later conversion.
 
Last edited:
Not a model 1842, it is a model 1840 made in 1842. They were originally flintlock, this one as most were, was converted to percussion. This one was done with the Belgian, cone in barrel conversion, this was the most common US conversion and officially done by US armorers.
 
Nice gun. Cool to own an 1840 as they were the last standard military issue flintlock muskets. I've got one with an H&P bolster conversion. Yours is an arsenal Belgian cone-in conversion as stated by Trot. How's the bore condition?
 
Thanks for all the info guys!
Either way I think it’s a cool part of history and I’m happy to have it.
The bore looks fine to me.
 
Very cool thanks for the info lead!

No problem.

If you are comfortable disassembling it, take a look at the stock between the barrel tang and hammer, and see if there is a stamped number that matches the undersurface of the barrel and breech plug. If there is, according to Johns the musket was one of the many converted at Springfield in 1851.

k6z11Uk.jpeg


IKT3c5B.jpeg
 
Back
Top