Gotta agree with that sir. It all comes down to skills. Stalking skills, shooting skills, and whatever skill it takes to know what your rifle will do, and what it wont. Some say that we need a huge bore to make up for poor shooting skills, but a small bore hole in the head or heart is better than a huge bore hole in the gut 10 out of 10 times.snake-eyes said:Micanopy,
I absolutely agree! I have harvested
more of my deer with my .45 than both my .50or.54.There are several reasons for this.
#1 I use it more
#2 Due to terrain,shots are seldom over 50yds,
most at 30/35yds
#3 I know my limits and stay within them.At 62+
years old they change yearly.As hard as it has
been,I accept that.It helps to have a 35year
old son that reminds me on occasion.Oh,I
my wife reminds me every once in
awhile:wink::rotf:wink::rotf:
snake-eyes:hmm:
Thank you and amen...BudMicanopy said:This hog wasnt in no pen, I have no idea where you got the idea that he was, nor was the Buffalo. I can tell you that anyone worth their salt knows that you don't ever take a shot you can't make. Matter of fact there are documented witness accounts at the Alamo that saw " A man wearing buckskin clothing on the top of the low barracks hitting men at distances to 250 yards with a small bore projectile". Granted you have to pick your shots carefully with smaller bores, but they will do the job, as is proof by the dead hog hanging in the photograph.
Am I telling anyone to go do it? No, I am mearly posting about a great weekend and one heck of a hunt. If one trumpets around in the woods like a herd of elephants they wont make shot set ups like that. But if one uses their skills and slips through the woods like one is supposed to, all things come together. It's a dead hog with a .32, and we ate Miccosukee chili and fry bread that night, and we were happy.
Enter your email address to join: