2 different 20 gauge smoothies, two totally different preferences.
One will shoot well with two totally different procedures even.
TVM Early Virginia Smoothrifle.
Load 1 = 85 grains 3f, 2 thin overshot card, lubed felt wad, .610 ball, two thin overshot cards.
Load 2 and variations of it = 65 grains 3f, .010 patched .595 ball (note this patch/ball combo shoots okay at 80 to 85 grains 3f but not as well as the load with wads and that powder charge). At 65 grains 3f, a .595 ball also shoots well in a paper cartridge, and shoots pretty good with wads.
This gun does not like tight loads, at all. The sags on how this was determined is posted elsewhere.
Centermark Fusil des Chase.
I don't have as much time spent in Load development with this gun, even though I've had it longer. It was/is my 1st flintlock and 1st smoothbore. When I got it I just shot with the load data the previous owner gave me and it shot well.
80 grains 3f under a .010 patched .600 round ball.
The gun was put aside for several years for a variety of reasons when I got the above smoothrifle. Early last year I decided to so some work on it and get it shooting again, adding a rear sight and correcting some issues. It is lighter and just handles so much better than the smoothrifle.
After some personal issues and loss of muscle mass since I last shot it, 80 grains with patched ball or wads was just more recoil than I wanted to shoot a lot off the bench. I also wanted a more historical load using wads.
So far, best load has been, 75 grains 3f, dry felt wad, lubed tow wad, .610 ball, thin overshot cards.
This gun (referred to earlier in another topic about loading smoothbores) does not like any type of stiff card/s between powder and ball.
Smoothbores are frustrating for load development,,,, many, many, combinations must be tried, and, many of these combinations defy logic and so called "conventional wisdom." Smoothbores break "the rules."