• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

777 Ignition Anomoly

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

arcticap

54 Cal.
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
2,656
Reaction score
640
Location
Central Connecticut
I went to the range Sunday with a new container of 777 3F to try in my Remington 1858 for the first time. I loaded 25 grains with an over powder card and tried not to compress it as much as I usually do when loading with APP 3F.
Early on during the first 6 full cylinders were one or two misfires which I figured were simply due to using some older Remington Golden #11 caps, even though I haven't had any trouble with ignition previously using them with APP.
However on the 7th full cylinder after loading as normal, I experienced a strange string of 6 ignition problems in a row.
Those last 6 shots consisted of 3 misfires and 3 squib loads. All 3 squib loads were expelled but not strong enough to reach the target at 12 yards.
I removed the cylinder without recapping and found that the balls were missing from all 6 chambers, even the 3 that had misfired.
Those chambers still had the over powder cards in them, however the cards were moved forward and were offset.
Looking under the cards, I was surprised to find that those 3 chambers were still fully loaded with powder. I ended up dumping the 777 on the ground while showing my shooting partner how they were still full.
The nipples weren't clogged or else the balls would have never been expelled by the misfires.
And for some reason, the troubles happened to all 6 chambers on the same 7th full cylinder, and all in a row.
I thought that this was strange enough to label as an anomoly because what are the chances of ignition trouble affecting every chamber at the same time?
The setting on my Triple P loader was left in the same position as most of the other full cylinders that I had previously loaded.
Maybe the powder was compressed too much. The fffg is a superfine powder granulation, and it was only sitting in the flask for less than an hour or two on a comfortably cool day. So I don't think that it went bad that fast.

It worked fine up until that point and the targets were fairly good, especially the last 18 shots up until the last cylinder full. (See below)
I was very surprised to see that the #11 caps were strong enough to expel the balls in the 3 chambers that misfired. I'm pretty sure that's directly attributable to the fairly tight fitting over powder cards that I punch out using a die. They retained enough of the expanding gas from the percussion cap to push the ball out yet the flame was not hot enough to ignite the 777.
I really don't intend to use 777 in my Remington anymore, at least not on a regular basis. It occurred to me afterward that any one of those last 6 shots could have become lodged in the barrel. Fortunately none of them did become lodged and no harm was done.
I've never had any notable ignition problem using 777 in other any other guns before. The powder shot fine up until that point, but the Triple P loading press that I use invites compressing the powder. I really didn't think that a little compression would hurt. Especially after the fairly accurate results of the 4th, 5th and 6th full cylinders of balls.
777 would probably benefit from using a booster charge to help insure ignition, or hotter or magnum caps. Perhaps this was all due to my loading method, or the Golden caps, or the nipples becoming more constricted with residue. But I would rather load with APP than to have a repeat of what happened today by loading this Pietta Remington with 777.
In hindsight, I should have used the newer Remington Green caps and not the older Remington Golden caps.


P1020629a65.jpg
 
One can only speculate on these things but I really don't see how a cap could develop enough pressure to drive a ball out of the cylinder and through the bore without also expelling the wad.
My thinking is that you had some undersized balls which simply fell out of the chamber, thus not providing enough resistance for the T7 to build up pressure which T7 requires to burn properly.
I once thought I'd get rid of some T7 powder by making up blank loads for a .45 Colt cartridge gun. It didn't work. The primer simply blew the T7 and wad out of the barrel like a load of tiny birdshot and the only sound was the pop of the primer. T7 needs resistance to build up pressure to burn properly.
T7 also had a limited shelf life after the container has been opened, could that be a factor?
 
I've had some odd squib shots using 777 in a Pedersoli derringer. Can't explain it but I know it doesn't happen with Pyrodex.

Don
 
I shoot T7 exclusively in my cap and ball revolvers. I don't compress but I make sure I have good ball tension. My chronograph says I have very consistent velocities. I also use it in my .44-40 Henry. Again, consistent velocities and good accuracy.

Dan
 
It was a brand new jug of 777 that was opened up for the first time.
I did take 3 measurements of one of the Hornady balls from the same package which are new production balls in their new packaging. 2 of the measurements were undersized while one measurement was spot on at .451. I did notice that the balls were not shaving as much of a lead ring as usual with the previous lots of Hornady balls. But they were being swagged into the chamber and weren't loose at all.
What built up enough pressure to expel the 3 misfires were the over powder cards made from juice cartons which effectively seal the chamber walls under the balls.

P1060004a25.jpg


P1060007a60.jpg
 
.451 is too small by a wide margin! Nothing less than .454 should be used in the Remmy copies. I use .457 in all my .44s and .375s in my .36 Navy. No compression to speak of.

Your experiences do not mirror anything I've ever encountered with T7. I now use only two powders. T7 and FFFG Goex. For my revolvers, it's T7 and Goex for everything else. I hope you get it sorted out.

Regards

Dan
 
CoyoteJoe said:
One can only speculate on these things but I really don't see how a cap could develop enough pressure to drive a ball out of the cylinder and through the bore without also expelling the wad....
...I once thought I'd get rid of some T7 powder by making up blank loads for a .45 Colt cartridge gun. It didn't work. The primer simply blew the T7 and wad out of the barrel like a load of tiny birdshot and the only sound was the pop of the primer. T7 needs resistance to build up pressure to burn properly.

After a lot of consideration I've come to the conclusion that I must have forgotten to load the balls and then fired off all of the chambers with only powder and over powder cards.
There's really no other explanation considering that three cylinders only popped which I thought were squibs, and 3 cylinders didn't fire off at all probably due to lack of compression.
If the balls were loaded as I thought then I believe that the powder would have fired just like all of the full cylinders did.
It was so odd that I didn't want to even consider that in my haste to load before my predetermined time to leave the range to go somewhere, that I must have rushed and left out loading the balls.
It's hard to admit but it's not as bad as dry balling the entire cylinder 6 times in a row and then having to remove each one I guess.
And once I put the over powder cards in each chamber, I must have had a senior moment and installed the cylinder without the balls in it.
That's the 1st time that ever happened to me. But if that's what did happen, then just admitting the possibility helps to insure that it won't happen again.
And what happened is what I really wanted to know.
I probably shouldn't have even mentioned the topic, but maybe posting about it has helped me to figure it out.
I wanted some answers and that's the best that I can come up with.
It's better than blaming it all on the powder.
Thanks for everyone's input which helped me to ponder about it long and hard enough to come up with this explanation.
 
Back
Top