My thoughts on the subject of this post:
One of our primary rules:
"We do not discuss inline firearms."
Another one of our guidelines:
"The main focus of this site is "Traditional Muzzleloading"; The history of the people, the weapons and battles, up to and including the American Civil War."
My thoughts on these and this post:
When the rule concerning In-Lines was written, it is my understanding that it was aimed at Modern In-Lines which have absolutely NO historical importance or relevance in a discussion of mans 19th century and prior history and the firearms involved in it.
The time frame guideline given would include a firearm made in 1860.
If the gun in question was made by
the Alexander Henry and it is
not a cartridge gun, it may be of some historical importance and discussion of it may be permitted.
If, on the other hand it is a cartridge gun, or was made by "Alex Henry" who works down at the local Department Store and refinishes CVA Inlines in his spare time it does not fit into our rules and therefore should not be discussed further.
Assuming it is of Historical importance discussions must be limited to this gun without bringing modern In-Lines into it.
zonie
(Now you see why I'm paid the "big bucks" :rotf:
PS: Claude is the owner and master of this Forum and if he feels this post doesn't fit, I'm sure he will delete it.