Michigan does allow a .32 to be used to hunt deer with. I don't want to debate ethics here, but I can assure you that the small bore, used at shorter ranges is very lethal when the ball is properly placed. My shots are limited to 35 yards or less. I use a range finder designed for bow hunting to determine the distance to certain objects from my deer stand. Once the deer enters that 35 yard ring then I wait for the perfect shot that is needed. I am a reasonaly good shot, this .32 is very accurate. Even deer movement at this short range is limited in the effect on the shot, but wait for them to stop still. I long bow hunted for many years and I am willing to wait for a good close shot, as I know that is what I need if I plan on making a clean harvest. (I would still be bow hunting, but due to a shoulder injury, that cannot be fully corrected, I am no longer able to pull my long bow with out damaging my shoulder more.) Deer hunting with a .32 is not, I repeat is NOT for everyone. However, many game officers, from many states will tell you that their poaching history will show that plenty of deer are killed every year(at short ranges) with a .22 rimfire. I have killed deer with 12 ga. slugs, muzzle loaders up to .58 cal, .243 win, and 2 bladed broadheads from a 73# long bow. If I placed the shot properly all of these weapons did a fine job of getting "my meat" for the larder. Please donot go into the "my caliber is better than your caliber debate" it reminds me of the "long bow/traditional hunters" vs. the "modern compound/mechanical blade" debate that parted many a friend in a bowhunting club I used to belonged to.
I say respect your states hunting regulations and respect the game that you are attempting to harvest by using a safe and humane means. To work outside of those boundaries is truly what is unethical. :hatsoff: