Gooddaytoya!
40 Cal
Since the breech plug is now working right and the barrel is now shiny clean thanks to everyone's help, I decided to slug the bore from the breech end since I never did know the exact dimension. My plan was to use the information to rationally and without blind guesses select as close as possible the right round ball and patch combination (As some may remember, the first 6 in of the muzzle end has been tampered with by a really good gunsmith who did his best to make that part of the barrel better. So there's no point in slugging the barrel from the muzzle. That's a story not worth telling.) I used an oversized round ball that I squashed a bit by tapping it with a hammer, to make sure it would fill the entire space within the bore. It went six inches in with typical difficulty, popped out with little resistance, and looks like I would never have expected it to look. The slug is hexagonal with rounded corners, probably about 5/32 or 3/16th inch radii. I took it to a machinist so the plug could be measured from flat to flat with a good micrometer. Does all this make sense to anyone? By what it looks like when I shine a light down the bore, I wouldn't have expected the slug to have that shape. Maybe it's hard to guess at the cross section of a spiral that plunges down into a rifle bore.
But this slug doesn't lie right?? Another thing about the slug is that it has two very thin straight lines on it which make me think that the rifling was made using the button method. A rotating cutter on a milling machine wouldn't leave those kinds of longitudinal grooves in the barrel, right? Therefore I assume this barrel was made with contemporary methods. It wouldn't bother me if the barrel had some longitudinal striations in it, as long as they follow the twist of the rifling. Does this long-winded post make sense?Any feedback? This is very interesting to me.
But this slug doesn't lie right?? Another thing about the slug is that it has two very thin straight lines on it which make me think that the rifling was made using the button method. A rotating cutter on a milling machine wouldn't leave those kinds of longitudinal grooves in the barrel, right? Therefore I assume this barrel was made with contemporary methods. It wouldn't bother me if the barrel had some longitudinal striations in it, as long as they follow the twist of the rifling. Does this long-winded post make sense?Any feedback? This is very interesting to me.