Anyone else chomping at the bit for the Kibler smoothbore?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The wait is killing me!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I intend to use mine as an upland/bunny/turkey gun.

I have always been interested in Chambers PA fowler, but I think the wait is almost over for the Kibler, maybe two more months?
I’m pretty excited! I have a Jackie brown fowling piece, that I reworked, to play with until then. It’ll be up for sale pretty soon though.
 
I'd be interested in one. Don't own a.smoothbore. is it supposed to be an English style.fowler?
When I talked to Mr Kibler at a show in Ohio in 2020 he said he was leaning strongly towards copying the Wilson Fowler in ‘Of Sorts for Provincials’.

ETA: I see he posted a few months back that he has studied many export grade originals to base his on.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully the barrel walls on his fowler/trade gun are THIN and the gun is LIGHT, as were the originals.

So many reproductions have thick, heavy barrels that balance and handle nothing like the original guns had, instead having barrel walls thicker than most muskets of the period.
 
Hopefully the barrel walls on his fowler/trade gun are THIN and the gun is LIGHT, as were the originals.

So many reproductions have thick, heavy barrels that balance and handle nothing like the original guns had, instead having barrel walls thicker than most muskets of the period.
My repopped trade gun with the Colrain barrel in 20 bore is lucky if its barely over 6lbs.
 
Hopefully the barrel walls on his fowler/trade gun are THIN and the gun is LIGHT, as were the originals.

So many reproductions have thick, heavy barrels that balance and handle nothing like the original guns had, instead having barrel walls thicker than most muskets of the period.
Agree, but any increased heft is largely a legal/liability issue. Have to thank the lawyers for it.
 
Hopefully the barrel walls on his fowler/trade gun are THIN and the gun is LIGHT, as were the originals.

So many reproductions have thick, heavy barrels that balance and handle nothing like the original guns had, instead having barrel walls thicker than most muskets of the period.
As I recall he has said that the plan is for a 16 gauge and a 20 gauge each with the same barrel profile. This likely means the 16 ga will be lighter than the 20 gauge.
 
Back
Top