I find it interesting that mid-sized patched balls killed millions upon millions of head of game, worldwide, for hundreds of years, and all of a sudden in the late 20th Century they were no longer capable of accomplishing the task at hand.
Even more interesting is the fact that muzzleloading barrel steel is better than ever before; barrels are rifled more precisely than ever before; the quality of black powder is better than ever before; and our knowledge of how to eek out top accuracy is more widespread than ever before.
But, a .45 caliber patched ball WON'T effectively kill a deer in many American states. And, a .50 caliber patched ball WON'T effectively kill an elk or moose in many American states.
Silly Rabbit Tricks Are For Kids!!!!!!
Reminds me of a story that Doc White told me on the phone about 8 months ago. Seems years ago at one of the western rendezvous, a newcomer was showing off his new .54 caliber custom rifle that he had just taken delivery of. It was going to be the best elk killing rifle ever, or so the guy claimed. One of the old timers there at the rendezvous looked the rifle over, and allowed as how it was a very nicely done rifle. When the newcomer ran out of steam extolling the virtues of his new gun, he asked the old timer who was holding his rifle, if he hunted elk, and if so what caliber did he use? The man handed him his rifle back, reached back, grabbed his eastern style longrifle in .50 caliber, and showed him the comb of the stock. Which had over a dozen small notches carved into it representing the bull elk that he had killed since moving west.
It's not the caliber, as much as it is the hunter. And his/her willingness to pass up questionable shots 100% of the time depending upon his/her rifles capabilities pushing a patched ball down range.
Or, better yet, committing yourself to becoming the best hunter that you can be. Which, admittedly can be tough. As a nation we are less fit than ever before in human history with more than 50% of the population overweight, obese, or morbidly obese. And, that includes the hunting population. Hunters who are not as fit as they could be are more likely, psychologically, to take a risky shot, than a fitter hunter would.