- Joined
- Mar 23, 2015
- Messages
- 5,010
- Reaction score
- 3,585
My Ardessa doesn't have a name or model on it and I was using the terms as related to a Hawken and not the TC style Hawken. Sorry for the confusion.
-
Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.
We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.
Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103
Ardesa Mountain Rifle
- Thread starter griffiga
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
Good score, brother!
I know about Ardesa, but have never heard of that particular model of rifle. It is a nice looking rifle. That trigger guard is nicely sculpted, and not overbuilt, as on some of the modern rifles. I like the clean look, without the cap-box. I find it interesting that the manufacturer took the trouble to fit an entry pipe in addition to a for end cap, like many of the finer rifles of the mid 19th century. Most of today's brass-mounted half stocks just have the nosecap, with a hole for the ramrod. The heavy barrel, a full inch across the flats is a plus in my opinion. Heavy barrels were the norm back in the day. I don't think I've seen inlays like those on a production built rifle of this type before.
I would just shoot it as it is. Maybe change to a fixed rear sight some day... Like you, I prefer them, but adjustable sights can be very practical. As for the finish, we know that many original Hawkens were blued. Time has changed the coloration to make us think they were all browned, and some were, but many of them were originally blued.
Another thing to consider is the resale value. If you find it's too heavy or doesn't fit you, and you want to resell it, refinishing will likely decrease its value. I know you don't have much in it, but I've never seen a rifle just like that one before, and I'm thinking it might be from a limited run. There's probably not much collector demand for those, but most people who buy guns want them as close to factory original as possible.
In any event, you got yourself a nice rifle!
Notchy Bob
I know about Ardesa, but have never heard of that particular model of rifle. It is a nice looking rifle. That trigger guard is nicely sculpted, and not overbuilt, as on some of the modern rifles. I like the clean look, without the cap-box. I find it interesting that the manufacturer took the trouble to fit an entry pipe in addition to a for end cap, like many of the finer rifles of the mid 19th century. Most of today's brass-mounted half stocks just have the nosecap, with a hole for the ramrod. The heavy barrel, a full inch across the flats is a plus in my opinion. Heavy barrels were the norm back in the day. I don't think I've seen inlays like those on a production built rifle of this type before.
I would just shoot it as it is. Maybe change to a fixed rear sight some day... Like you, I prefer them, but adjustable sights can be very practical. As for the finish, we know that many original Hawkens were blued. Time has changed the coloration to make us think they were all browned, and some were, but many of them were originally blued.
Another thing to consider is the resale value. If you find it's too heavy or doesn't fit you, and you want to resell it, refinishing will likely decrease its value. I know you don't have much in it, but I've never seen a rifle just like that one before, and I'm thinking it might be from a limited run. There's probably not much collector demand for those, but most people who buy guns want them as close to factory original as possible.
In any event, you got yourself a nice rifle!
Notchy Bob
That was a good find and congratulations.
As mentioned already, Ardessa had/has intertwined links to CVA, Traditions, Jukar and Dikar.
And they are known to have excellent accuracy.
As mentioned already, Ardessa had/has intertwined links to CVA, Traditions, Jukar and Dikar.
And they are known to have excellent accuracy.
I have an Ardesa Hawken in .451 with the 1:20 twist, shoots conical bullets through the same hole at 100m, I have shot steel at 200m but couldn't see where the shot was falling at 300m to adjust the sights properly. One day I want to see if I can take it out to 600yards, but need the ranges to open first!
I for one like it. NO BELLS & WHISTLES!! nothing that is not needed!
Learn something new every day here
Neil
Yes, this seems to be the Ardesa version of the CVA mountain rifle. Has a little more embellishment but the basic structure is that of the kind they supplied to CVA. Has anybody got an idea of the bore twist? Roundball friendly like the older CVAs or middle of the road 1:48?
Russ T Frizzen
70 Cal.
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2004
- Messages
- 5,007
- Reaction score
- 423
That rifle has some notable differences from the CVA Mountain Rifle. The lock is very different from the usual "Maslin" style that CVA used and the nose cap/entry pipe area is much more elegantly developed. The CVA version generally used a maple stock. I've never seen one with a walnut stock before. I don't know what you have there, but it is definitely a cut above the CVA product in terms of style and finish. You did well.
I agree 100%, about the only resemblance to a CVA Mountain rifle is that they are both half stock with 2 wedges.
I wanted a 36 cal for some time. I finally got one at a reasonable price. Turns out it was a Ardesa. I got it from a guy that bought it used and he said he never even fired it. Accuracy was poor when I got it, it literally destroyed patches. I lapped it some and kept shooting it and it did much better. Seems like every time I took it out it shot better. I think the guy fired it and sold it due to accuracy issues. Anyway, I kinda believe it was never even broken in yet. Rifling was crisp and I think had sharp edges.
Anyway it also has no markings saying model number but from some internet searching I believe it to be called a Ranger. I like it allot now that it shoots half way decent but I still have some work to do to improve accuracy. It's a fun little gun to shoot.
Anyway it also has no markings saying model number but from some internet searching I believe it to be called a Ranger. I like it allot now that it shoots half way decent but I still have some work to do to improve accuracy. It's a fun little gun to shoot.
user 48679
54 Cal.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,660
- Reaction score
- 2,155
FWIW, my CVA Premier Grade Mountain rifle has a walnut stock with a little fiddleback figure/graining near the butt plate
Treestalker
Treestalker
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
- Messages
- 4,051
- Reaction score
- 3,748
- Location
- Third Pond from the Great God Helios
Since black powder is supposed to regularly generate 25/30 thousand pounds of pressure and U.S. Army tests back in the day achieved over 90,000lbs. of pressure with black powder they had Back Then, I'm leery of anything tested to such a low standard even though my first ML rifle was a CVA Kentucky. I guess since America has no proof houses, we should trust ourselves to the excellent reputations of foreign testing, and the forbearance of barrel steels.
Flinty Scot
40 Cal
That's a fine looking rifle. The sights don't match the rest of it, in period or overall appearance.
A heavy barrelled .36 makes it even more attractive. I'd change them, but stop there & just shoot it.
Have fun.
A heavy barrelled .36 makes it even more attractive. I'd change them, but stop there & just shoot it.
Have fun.
Cva never used ardesa. They used jukar and dikar. This rifle has zero in common with the cva mountain rifle. With that walnut stock and heavy barrel, they tip the scale at 10lbs, or close to it.
Hermanoshawken
36 Cal.
- Joined
- May 20, 2014
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 109
Hello. As I live in Spain I can give you some information about that Ardesa replica of the Hawken. That model and also in caliber 50 was the first rifle that I bought in 1988, when I was 25 years old. If it is a 50 caliber, it has a 66" twist. Therefore, it is a good rifle to shoot with a round ball, especially with not very high loads, since the groove is not very deep. At 50 meters it groups very well with 50 grains of black powder. Swiss No. 2 (3fff). Use 0.490 ball and 0.015" linen patch. And trade the rear sight for a semi-buckhorn. Walnut wood is of good quality and if it takes away the shine you can finish it with linseed oil, in a more natural way and with a very beautiful darker color. The nipple is metric thread 6x100. It is a very good heavy rifle for competitions for 50 meters (55 yards) or for hunting, but with a round bullet, because with a maxi bullet I don't think it will group well.
If the nipple does not transmit fire well, you may need to remove the side drum and trim it so that the fire from the nipple communicates well with the breech that closes the barrel. You can also change the side drum for a good quality steel one, like the one you sell for Spanish guns Track of the Wolf (from Dikar-CVA- and Ardesa -Traditions-).
Greetings from Spain.
If the nipple does not transmit fire well, you may need to remove the side drum and trim it so that the fire from the nipple communicates well with the breech that closes the barrel. You can also change the side drum for a good quality steel one, like the one you sell for Spanish guns Track of the Wolf (from Dikar-CVA- and Ardesa -Traditions-).
Greetings from Spain.
Now that's how you answer a question! That was great.
I just ordered a primitive sight for it from TOTW. Thanks
