54mountain said:
This is not a reply to anyone in particular but how many of you naysayers have dropped a light down the bore to check out the condition of said bore, what's the difference you still have your face in front of the muzzle right?
You have this backwards. The burden does not exist for people who expect reasonable safety measures to explain the obvious concerns involved in muzzles being kept in safe directions. The burden is upon people breaking common sense rules. In short, there must be a compelling reason for taking such risks. There is nothing here which is even slightly convincing.
But since you want the differences explained:
Bore inspections are rarely, if ever done. Therefore, the normal routine of loading and shooting does not lead one into an automated action which during an abnormal instance can foreseeably lead to a tragic result. Laugh if you like, but as a range officer of civilllian and law enforcement personnel, I have witnessed small errors which came far too close to tragic results and seen the aftermath of a tragic event. Yes, with modern equipment, but the basics are identical.
But even under the best circumstances the practice of putting your mouth over the muzzle of any arm leaves a terrible image to anyone witnessing the event.
When a bore inspection must be done, I run a rod down to check for the breach distance and also to hear the vent immediately before putting my eye in front of the muzzle. (But then, running a rod down will likely tell me what I need to know anyway.)
I still see no compelling reason for this bizarre practice.
What does it accomplish that a damp patch on a rod will not do better and safer?
Articulate the basis for doing such a strange thing - or finally admit that you are simply clinging to a ridiculous tradition which should have been abandoned long ago.
CS